Model comparison

Codellama 34b Instruct vs Grok-3 mini

Grok-3 mini is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.2 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 10 shared benchmarks.

Codellama 34b Instruct Meta

30.8

Rank #287 Confirmed

Grok-3 mini xAI

41.2

Rank #141 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Codellama 34b Instruct scores higher in 1 category and Grok-3 mini in 6 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in instruction following, where Grok-3 mini leads 78.5 to 52.2.
  • Codellama 34b Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Codellama 34b Instruct and Grok-3 mini specifications
Codellama 34b InstructGrok-3 mini
ProviderMetaxAI
Noometry Index30.841.2
Released—2025-04-09
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked1435

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Grok-3 mini leads

Codellama 34b Instruct: 28.5 (#314), Grok-3 mini: 40.8 (#131)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructGrok-3 mini
LMArena Coding10461379
Aider Polyglot—49.3%
WeirdML—42.6%
BigCodeBench Instruct29%—
BigCodeBench Complete37.1%—
HumanEval+43.9%—
MBPP+56.3%—

Reasoning Codellama 34b Instruct leads

Codellama 34b Instruct: 19.6 (#255), Grok-3 mini: 13.6 (#334)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructGrok-3 mini
LMArena Hard Prompts10321375
ARC-AGI-2—0.4%
Kagi LLM Benchmark—61.3%
ARC-AGI-1—16.5%
Epoch Capabilities Index—140.35

Math Grok-3 mini leads

Codellama 34b Instruct: 31.0 (#230), Grok-3 mini: 42.1 (#85)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructGrok-3 mini
LMArena Math10561386
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—77.8%
Omni-MATH—31.8%
MATH Level 5—90.9%
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)—5.9%

Knowledge Not comparable

Codellama 34b Instruct: —, Grok-3 mini: 46.4 (#81)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructGrok-3 mini
GPQA Diamond—76.3%
MMLU-Pro—79.9%
Confabulations—10.8%
GPQA (HELM)—67.5%
LMArena Expert—1395

Multilingual Grok-3 mini leads

Codellama 34b Instruct: 25.8 (#284), Grok-3 mini: 48.1 (#145)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructGrok-3 mini
LMArena Non-English10111352
LMArena Chinese9761387
LMArena French—1357
LMArena German—1349
LMArena Japanese—1342
LMArena Korean—1335
LMArena Russian—1353
LMArena Spanish—1381

Instruction Following Grok-3 mini leads

Codellama 34b Instruct: 52.2 (#291), Grok-3 mini: 78.5 (#9)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructGrok-3 mini
LMArena Instruction Following10281357
IFEval—95.1%

Long Context Grok-3 mini leads

Codellama 34b Instruct: 30.9 (#284), Grok-3 mini: 41.0 (#147)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructGrok-3 mini
LMArena Longer Query10131372
Fiction.LiveBench—66.7%

Writing & Preference Grok-3 mini leads

Codellama 34b Instruct: 28.2 (#297), Grok-3 mini: 52.5 (#169)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructGrok-3 mini
LMArena Text10661370
LMArena Creative Writing10321342
LMArena Multi-Turn10151355
Short-Story Creative Writing—73.5%
WildBench—65.1%

Frequently asked questions

Is Codellama 34b Instruct better than Grok-3 mini?

Grok-3 mini is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.2 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index.

Is Codellama 34b Instruct or Grok-3 mini better for coding?

Grok-3 mini scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.8 versus 28.5 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Codellama 34b Instruct and Grok-3 mini share?

10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Codellama 34b Instruct has 14 scored results on Noometry and Grok-3 mini has 35.

Related comparisons

Go deeper