Model comparison

Grok-3 mini vs Nemotron 4 340b Instruct

Grok-3 mini is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.0 to 35.3 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.

Grok-3 mini xAI

41.0

Rank #130 Confirmed

Nemotron 4 340b Instruct NVIDIA

35.3

Rank #218 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Grok-3 mini scores higher in 7 categories and Nemotron 4 340b Instruct in 1 category; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in instruction following, where Grok-3 mini leads 78.7 to 63.3.
  • Nemotron 4 340b Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Grok-3 mini and Nemotron 4 340b Instruct specifications
Grok-3 miniNemotron 4 340b Instruct
ProviderxAINVIDIA
Noometry Index41.035.3
Released2025-04-092024-06-14
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked3517

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Grok-3 mini leads

Grok-3 mini: 40.4 (#126), Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 34.6 (#223)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok-3 miniNemotron 4 340b Instruct
LMArena Coding13801209
Aider Polyglot49.3%—
WeirdML42.6%—

Reasoning Nemotron 4 340b Instruct leads

Grok-3 mini: 13.8 (#323), Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 22.4 (#180)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok-3 miniNemotron 4 340b Instruct
LMArena Hard Prompts13741202
ARC-AGI-20.4%—
Kagi LLM Benchmark61.3%—
ARC-AGI-116.5%—
Epoch Capabilities Index140.35—

Math Grok-3 mini leads

Grok-3 mini: 40.3 (#78), Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 31.7 (#193)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok-3 miniNemotron 4 340b Instruct
LMArena Math13861216
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202577.8%—
Omni-MATH31.8%—
MATH Level 590.9%—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)5.9%—

Knowledge Grok-3 mini leads

Grok-3 mini: 46.3 (#75), Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 31.4 (#212)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok-3 miniNemotron 4 340b Instruct
LMArena Expert13951171
GPQA Diamond76.3%—
MMLU-Pro79.9%—
Confabulations10.8%—
GPQA (HELM)67.5%—

Multilingual Grok-3 mini leads

Grok-3 mini: 48.3 (#141), Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 38.0 (#228)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok-3 miniNemotron 4 340b Instruct
LMArena Non-English13521206
LMArena Chinese13871214
LMArena French13571196
LMArena German13501192
LMArena Japanese13431128
LMArena Korean13361148
LMArena Russian13521219
LMArena Spanish13791195

Instruction Following Grok-3 mini leads

Grok-3 mini: 78.7 (#8), Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 63.3 (#227)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok-3 miniNemotron 4 340b Instruct
LMArena Instruction Following13561203
IFEval95.1%—

Long Context Grok-3 mini leads

Grok-3 mini: 41.0 (#142), Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 37.1 (#216)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok-3 miniNemotron 4 340b Instruct
LMArena Longer Query13721225
Fiction.LiveBench66.7%—

Writing & Preference Grok-3 mini leads

Grok-3 mini: 52.7 (#163), Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 42.9 (#229)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok-3 miniNemotron 4 340b Instruct
LMArena Text13701225
LMArena Creative Writing13421203
LMArena Multi-Turn13551214
Short-Story Creative Writing73.5%—
WildBench65.1%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Grok-3 mini better than Nemotron 4 340b Instruct?

Grok-3 mini is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.0 to 35.3 on the Noometry Index.

Is Grok-3 mini or Nemotron 4 340b Instruct better for coding?

Grok-3 mini scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.4 versus 34.6 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Grok-3 mini and Nemotron 4 340b Instruct share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Grok-3 mini has 35 scored results on Noometry and Nemotron 4 340b Instruct has 17.

Related comparisons

Go deeper