Model comparison
Grok-3 mini vs MiniMax-M3
MiniMax-M3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.8 to 41.2 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 20 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 20 benchmarks with published results for both. Grok-3 mini scores higher in 2 categories and MiniMax-M3 in 6 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where MiniMax-M3 leads 30.1 to 13.6.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is GPQA Diamond: 76.3% for Grok-3 mini and 90.9% for MiniMax-M3.
- MiniMax-M3 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Grok-3 mini | MiniMax-M3 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | xAI | MiniMax |
| Noometry Index | 41.2 | 43.8 |
| Released | 2025-04-09 | 2026-06-01 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | 1M |
| Max output | — | 512K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.30 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $1.20 |
| Results tracked | 35 | 41 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Too close to call
Grok-3 mini: 40.8 (#131), MiniMax-M3: 41.8 (#118)
| Benchmark | Grok-3 mini | MiniMax-M3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1379 | 1469 |
| FrontierCode | — | 14.7% |
| Aider Polyglot | 49.3% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1482 |
| SciCode | — | 47.1% |
| WeirdML | 42.6% | — |
| ALE-Bench | — | 640.02 |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Grok-3 mini: —, MiniMax-M3: 22.6 (#130)
| Benchmark | Grok-3 mini | MiniMax-M3 |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | — | 37.7% |
| OSWorld 2.0 | — | 4.6% |
| GBAEval | — | 0.9% |
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | 2,158 |
Reasoning MiniMax-M3 leads
Grok-3 mini: 13.6 (#334), MiniMax-M3: 30.1 (#87)
| Benchmark | Grok-3 mini | MiniMax-M3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1375 | 1447 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 140.35 | 146.95 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 0.4% | — |
| SimpleBench | — | 45.8% |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 61.3% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 65.1% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 16.5% | — |
| CritPt | — | 3.7% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 14% |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 8% |
| DTBench | — | 78.9% |
| LMCA | — | 33.7% |
| Surface Evolver Bench | — | 55% |
| ForecastBench | — | 61.4 |
Math Grok-3 mini leads
Grok-3 mini: 42.1 (#85), MiniMax-M3: 40.0 (#95)
| Benchmark | Grok-3 mini | MiniMax-M3 |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 77.8% | 71.1% |
| LMArena Math | 1386 | 1429 |
| ProofBench | — | 18% |
| Omni-MATH | 31.8% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 90.9% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 5.9% | — |
Knowledge MiniMax-M3 leads
Grok-3 mini: 46.4 (#81), MiniMax-M3: 58.4 (#35)
| Benchmark | Grok-3 mini | MiniMax-M3 |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 76.3% | 90.9% |
| LMArena Expert | 1395 | 1461 |
| MMLU-Pro | 79.9% | — |
| Confabulations | 10.8% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 67.5% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Grok-3 mini: —, MiniMax-M3: 40.2 (#51)
| Benchmark | Grok-3 mini | MiniMax-M3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1253 |
| LMArena Document | — | 1435 |
Multilingual MiniMax-M3 leads
Grok-3 mini: 48.1 (#145), MiniMax-M3: 53.0 (#75)
| Benchmark | Grok-3 mini | MiniMax-M3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1352 | 1420 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1387 | 1463 |
| LMArena French | 1357 | 1447 |
| LMArena German | 1349 | 1426 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1342 | 1381 |
| LMArena Korean | 1335 | 1372 |
| LMArena Russian | 1353 | 1428 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1381 | 1432 |
Instruction Following Grok-3 mini leads
Grok-3 mini: 78.5 (#9), MiniMax-M3: 75.5 (#62)
| Benchmark | Grok-3 mini | MiniMax-M3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1357 | 1433 |
| IFEval | 95.1% | — |
Long Context MiniMax-M3 leads
Grok-3 mini: 41.0 (#147), MiniMax-M3: 44.2 (#72)
| Benchmark | Grok-3 mini | MiniMax-M3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1372 | 1445 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | 66.7% | — |
Writing & Preference MiniMax-M3 leads
Grok-3 mini: 52.5 (#169), MiniMax-M3: 62.1 (#83)
| Benchmark | Grok-3 mini | MiniMax-M3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1370 | 1433 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1342 | 1404 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1355 | 1442 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | 73.5% | — |
| WildBench | 65.1% | — |
| EQ-Bench 4 | — | 1150 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Grok-3 mini better than MiniMax-M3?
MiniMax-M3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.8 to 41.2 on the Noometry Index.
Is Grok-3 mini or MiniMax-M3 better for coding?
They score almost the same on coding (40.8 vs 41.8); test both on your own repository before choosing.
How many benchmarks do Grok-3 mini and MiniMax-M3 share?
20 benchmarks have published results for both models. Grok-3 mini has 35 scored results on Noometry and MiniMax-M3 has 41.