Model comparison

Grok-3 mini vs Mercury 2

Grok-3 mini is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.2 to 39.1 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

Grok-3 mini xAI

41.2

Rank #141 Confirmed

Mercury 2 Inception

39.1

Rank #175 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Grok-3 mini scores higher in 5 categories and Mercury 2 in 2 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Mercury 2 leads 23.8 to 13.6.

Side by side

Grok-3 mini and Mercury 2 specifications
Grok-3 miniMercury 2
ProviderxAIInception
Noometry Index41.239.1
Released2025-04-092026-02-20
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window—128K
Max output—50K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.25
Output $ / M tokens—$0.75
Results tracked3517

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Grok-3 mini leads

Grok-3 mini: 40.8 (#131), Mercury 2: 33.5 (#255)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok-3 miniMercury 2
WeirdML42.6%43.2%
LMArena Coding13791391
Aider Polyglot49.3%—
LMArena WebDev—1171
SciCode—38.7%
ALE-Bench—785.58

Reasoning Mercury 2 leads

Grok-3 mini: 13.6 (#334), Mercury 2: 23.8 (#170)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok-3 miniMercury 2
LMArena Hard Prompts13751362
ARC-AGI-20.4%—
Kagi LLM Benchmark61.3%—
ARC-AGI-116.5%—
CritPt—0.8%
Epoch Capabilities Index140.35—

Math Not comparable

Grok-3 mini: 42.1 (#85), Mercury 2: —

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok-3 miniMercury 2
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202577.8%—
Omni-MATH31.8%—
LMArena Math1386—
MATH Level 590.9%—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)5.9%—

Knowledge Grok-3 mini leads

Grok-3 mini: 46.4 (#81), Mercury 2: 36.2 (#172)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok-3 miniMercury 2
LMArena Expert13951358
GPQA Diamond76.3%—
MMLU-Pro79.9%—
Confabulations10.8%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate—12.3%
GPQA (HELM)67.5%—

Multilingual Grok-3 mini leads

Grok-3 mini: 48.1 (#145), Mercury 2: 46.6 (#157)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok-3 miniMercury 2
LMArena Non-English13521331
LMArena Chinese13871417
LMArena Russian13531304
LMArena French1357—
LMArena German1349—
LMArena Japanese1342—
LMArena Korean1335—
LMArena Spanish1381—

Instruction Following Grok-3 mini leads

Grok-3 mini: 78.5 (#9), Mercury 2: 70.2 (#165)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok-3 miniMercury 2
LMArena Instruction Following13571329
IFEval95.1%—

Long Context Too close to call

Grok-3 mini: 41.0 (#147), Mercury 2: 40.5 (#154)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok-3 miniMercury 2
LMArena Longer Query13721330
Fiction.LiveBench66.7%—

Writing & Preference Mercury 2 leads

Grok-3 mini: 52.5 (#169), Mercury 2: 53.8 (#155)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok-3 miniMercury 2
LMArena Text13701355
LMArena Creative Writing13421289
LMArena Multi-Turn13551358
Short-Story Creative Writing73.5%—
WildBench65.1%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Grok-3 mini better than Mercury 2?

Grok-3 mini is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.2 to 39.1 on the Noometry Index.

Is Grok-3 mini or Mercury 2 better for coding?

Grok-3 mini scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.8 versus 33.5 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Grok-3 mini and Mercury 2 share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Grok-3 mini has 35 scored results on Noometry and Mercury 2 has 17.

Related comparisons

Go deeper