Model comparison
Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 vs Mercury 2
Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.3 to 39.1 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 11 shared benchmarks.
TencentSummary
- They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 scores higher in 7 categories and Mercury 2 in 0 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in coding, where Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads 40.0 to 33.5.
Side by side
| Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 | Mercury 2 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Tencent | Inception |
| Noometry Index | 41.3 | 39.1 |
| Released | — | 2026-02-20 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 128K |
| Max output | — | 50K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.25 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.75 |
| Results tracked | 16 | 17 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads
Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 40.0 (#152), Mercury 2: 33.5 (#255)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 | Mercury 2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1361 | 1391 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1171 |
| SciCode | — | 38.7% |
| WeirdML | — | 43.2% |
| ALE-Bench | — | 785.58 |
Reasoning Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads
Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 27.8 (#113), Mercury 2: 23.8 (#170)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 | Mercury 2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1374 | 1362 |
| CritPt | — | 0.8% |
Math Not comparable
Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 37.5 (#154), Mercury 2: —
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 | Mercury 2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1359 | — |
Knowledge Too close to call
Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 37.0 (#161), Mercury 2: 36.2 (#172)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 | Mercury 2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1339 | 1358 |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 12.3% |
Multilingual Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads
Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 48.9 (#136), Mercury 2: 46.6 (#157)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 | Mercury 2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1363 | 1331 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1417 | 1417 |
| LMArena Russian | 1368 | 1304 |
| LMArena French | 1391 | — |
| LMArena German | 1355 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1342 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1351 | — |
Instruction Following Too close to call
Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 71.0 (#158), Mercury 2: 70.2 (#165)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 | Mercury 2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1344 | 1329 |
Long Context Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads
Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 41.6 (#136), Mercury 2: 40.5 (#154)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 | Mercury 2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1366 | 1330 |
Writing & Preference Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads
Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 57.4 (#128), Mercury 2: 53.8 (#155)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 | Mercury 2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1377 | 1355 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1359 | 1289 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1387 | 1358 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 better than Mercury 2?
Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.3 to 39.1 on the Noometry Index.
Is Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 or Mercury 2 better for coding?
Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.0 versus 33.5 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 and Mercury 2 share?
11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 has 16 scored results on Noometry and Mercury 2 has 17.