Noometry

Model comparison

Grok-3 mini vs Grok 4.7

Grok 4.7 is the stronger model overall, scoring 53.1 to 41.2 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.

Grok-3 mini xAI

41.2

Rank #141 Confirmed

Grok 4.7 xAI

53.1

Rank #37 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Grok-3 mini scores higher in 1 category and Grok 4.7 in 7 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Grok 4.7 leads 49.1 to 13.6.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 77.8% for Grok-3 mini and 98.1% for Grok 4.7.

Side by side

Grok-3 miniGrok 4.7
ProviderxAIxAI
Noometry Index41.253.1
Released2025-04-092026-09-21
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window—500K
Max output—500K
Input $ / M tokens—$2
Output $ / M tokens—$6
Results tracked3539

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Grok 4.7 leads

Grok-3 mini: 40.8 (#131), Grok 4.7: 58.0 (#18)

BenchmarkGrok-3 miniGrok 4.7
LMArena Coding13791427
FrontierCode—47.6%
Aider Polyglot49.3%—
CursorBench—46.3%
LMArena WebDev—1639
FrontierSWE—29.5%
SciCode—57.8%
WeirdML42.6%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Grok-3 mini: —, Grok 4.7: 36.7 (#37)

BenchmarkGrok-3 miniGrok 4.7
APEX-Agents—54.6%
GDP.pdf—22.8%
Vending-Bench 2—10,537

Reasoning Grok 4.7 leads

Grok-3 mini: 13.6 (#334), Grok 4.7: 49.1 (#40)

BenchmarkGrok-3 miniGrok 4.7
LMArena Hard Prompts13751413
Epoch Capabilities Index140.35153.53
ARC-AGI-20.4%—
Kagi LLM Benchmark61.3%—
NYT Connections (extended)—76.8%
ARC-AGI-116.5%—
CritPt—18%
Chess Puzzles—38%
Mystery Game Puzzles—29%
DTBench—96%
LMCA—49.4%

Math Grok 4.7 leads

Grok-3 mini: 42.1 (#85), Grok 4.7: 57.8 (#39)

BenchmarkGrok-3 miniGrok 4.7
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202577.8%98.1%
LMArena Math13861407
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—53%
FrontierMath Tier 4—17.1%
ProofBench—34%
Omni-MATH31.8%—
MATH Level 590.9%—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)5.9%—

Knowledge Grok 4.7 leads

Grok-3 mini: 46.4 (#81), Grok 4.7: 62.8 (#22)

BenchmarkGrok-3 miniGrok 4.7
GPQA Diamond76.3%92.7%
LMArena Expert13951422
SimpleQA Verified—56%
MMLU-Pro79.9%—
Confabulations10.8%—
GPQA (HELM)67.5%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Grok-3 mini: —, Grok 4.7: 35.5 (#87)

BenchmarkGrok-3 miniGrok 4.7
LMArena Vision—1228
Blueprint-Bench 2—32.5%
Furniture Assembly—20.8%

Multilingual Grok 4.7 leads

Grok-3 mini: 48.1 (#145), Grok 4.7: 50.8 (#116)

BenchmarkGrok-3 miniGrok 4.7
LMArena Non-English13521389
LMArena Chinese13871455
LMArena French13571455
LMArena Russian13531397
LMArena Spanish13811400
LMArena German1349—
LMArena Japanese1342—
LMArena Korean1335—

Instruction Following Grok-3 mini leads

Grok-3 mini: 78.5 (#9), Grok 4.7: 74.1 (#105)

BenchmarkGrok-3 miniGrok 4.7
LMArena Instruction Following13571404
IFEval95.1%—

Long Context Grok 4.7 leads

Grok-3 mini: 41.0 (#147), Grok 4.7: 43.1 (#104)

BenchmarkGrok-3 miniGrok 4.7
LMArena Longer Query13721413
Fiction.LiveBench66.7%—

Writing & Preference Grok 4.7 leads

Grok-3 mini: 52.5 (#169), Grok 4.7: 70.0 (#24)

BenchmarkGrok-3 miniGrok 4.7
LMArena Text13701399
LMArena Creative Writing13421391
LMArena Multi-Turn13551393
Short-Story Creative Writing73.5%—
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—2007
WildBench65.1%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Grok-3 mini better than Grok 4.7?

Grok 4.7 is the stronger model overall, scoring 53.1 to 41.2 on the Noometry Index.

Is Grok-3 mini or Grok 4.7 better for coding?

Grok 4.7 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 58.0 versus 40.8 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Grok-3 mini and Grok 4.7 share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Grok-3 mini has 35 scored results on Noometry and Grok 4.7 has 39.

Related comparisons

Go deeper