Model comparison
Grok 4.7 vs Kimi K2 (Jul 2025)
Grok 4.7 is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.6 to 40.9 on the Noometry Index. Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) costs 3.0× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Grok 4.7's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Last verified . 13 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Grok 4.7 scores higher in 8 categories and Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Grok 4.7 leads 40.1 to 22.7.
- Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) is cheaper at $0.57 / $2.30 per million input/output tokens, against $2 / $6 for Grok 4.7.
- Grok 4.7 accepts more context: 500K tokens versus 262K.
- Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Grok 4.7 | Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | xAI | Moonshot AI |
| Noometry Index | 46.6 | 40.9 |
| Released | 2026-09-21 | 2025-07-12 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | 500K | 262K |
| Max output | 500K | 262K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $2 | $0.57 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $6 | $2.30 |
| Results tracked | 21 | 42 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Grok 4.7 leads
Grok 4.7: 55.0 (#23), Kimi K2 (Jul 2025): 43.1 (#83)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1423 | 1399 |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | — | 63.4% |
| Aider Polyglot | — | 59.1% |
| CursorBench | 46.3% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | 1636 | — |
| FrontierSWE | 29.5% | — |
| SciCode | 57.4% | — |
| GSO | — | 4.9% |
| WeirdML | — | 42.8% |
| ALE-Bench | — | 597.5 |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Grok 4.7: —, Kimi K2 (Jul 2025): 32.2 (#59)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | — | 35.7% |
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 59.1% |
| METR Time Horizons | — | 59.2% |
Reasoning Grok 4.7 leads
Grok 4.7: 40.1 (#49), Kimi K2 (Jul 2025): 22.7 (#173)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1409 | 1384 |
| SimpleBench | — | 26.3% |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 64.4% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 76.8% | — |
| CritPt | 17.7% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 146.02 |
| ForecastBench | — | 60.2 |
Math Grok 4.7 leads
Grok 4.7: 41.1 (#73), Kimi K2 (Jul 2025): 40.1 (#81)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1393 | 1396 |
| ProofBench | 34% | — |
| Omni-MATH | — | 65.4% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 21.4% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | — | 0% |
Knowledge Grok 4.7 leads
Grok 4.7: 38.7 (#130), Kimi K2 (Jul 2025): 36.9 (#153)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1413 | 1363 |
| MMLU-Pro | — | 81.9% |
| Confabulations | — | 20.4% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 17.9% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 65.3% |
Multimodal Not comparable
Grok 4.7: 28.8 (#107), Kimi K2 (Jul 2025): —
| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) |
|---|---|---|
| Furniture Assembly | 20.8% | — |
Multilingual Grok 4.7 leads
Grok 4.7: 51.2 (#108), Kimi K2 (Jul 2025): 49.8 (#125)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1392 | 1372 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1476 | 1416 |
| LMArena Russian | 1396 | 1384 |
| LMArena French | — | 1379 |
| LMArena German | — | 1386 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1349 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1324 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1383 |
Instruction Following Grok 4.7 leads
Grok 4.7: 74.3 (#98), Kimi K2 (Jul 2025): 71.3 (#151)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1406 | 1347 |
| IFEval | — | 85% |
Long Context Grok 4.7 leads
Grok 4.7: 43.2 (#97), Kimi K2 (Jul 2025): 41.2 (#140)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1416 | 1353 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 66.7% |
| CL-bench | — | 17.6% |
Writing & Preference Grok 4.7 leads
Grok 4.7: 70.1 (#23), Kimi K2 (Jul 2025): 62.5 (#76)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1397 | 1380 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1391 | 1349 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 2007 | 1666 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1389 | 1371 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | — | 85.6% |
| WildBench | — | 86.2% |
Frequently asked questions
Is Grok 4.7 better than Kimi K2 (Jul 2025)?
Grok 4.7 is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.6 to 40.9 on the Noometry Index. Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) costs 3.0× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Grok 4.7's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Which is cheaper, Grok 4.7 or Kimi K2 (Jul 2025)?
Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) is cheaper. It lists at $0.57 per million input tokens and $2.30 per million output tokens; Grok 4.7 lists at $2 and $6.
Is Grok 4.7 or Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) better for coding?
Grok 4.7 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 55.0 versus 43.1 in the Noometry coding category.
Which has the bigger context window?
Grok 4.7 does, with 500K tokens against 262K.
How many benchmarks do Grok 4.7 and Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) share?
13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Grok 4.7 has 21 scored results on Noometry and Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) has 42.