Model comparison

Grok-2 (Dec 2024) vs Qwen1.5-32B

Grok-2 (Dec 2024) is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.4 to 30.0 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 18 shared benchmarks.

Grok-2 (Dec 2024) xAI

33.4

Rank #233 Confirmed

Qwen1.5-32B Alibaba (Qwen)

30.0

Rank #288 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 18 benchmarks with published results for both. Grok-2 (Dec 2024) scores higher in 6 categories and Qwen1.5-32B in 2 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Grok-2 (Dec 2024) leads 29.8 to 13.5.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is GPQA Diamond: 53.8% for Grok-2 (Dec 2024) and 30.7% for Qwen1.5-32B.
  • Qwen1.5-32B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Grok-2 (Dec 2024) and Qwen1.5-32B specifications
Grok-2 (Dec 2024)Qwen1.5-32B
ProviderxAIAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index33.430.0
Released2024-08-132024-02-04
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked3421

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Grok-2 (Dec 2024) leads

Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 32.9 (#254), Qwen1.5-32B: 31.1 (#278)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok-2 (Dec 2024)Qwen1.5-32B
LMArena Coding12881155
WeirdML22.2%—
BigCodeBench Instruct—32.3%
LiveBench Coding46.4%—
BigCodeBench Complete—42%

Reasoning Qwen1.5-32B leads

Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 16.4 (#294), Qwen1.5-32B: 20.9 (#210)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok-2 (Dec 2024)Qwen1.5-32B
LMArena Hard Prompts12721131
SimpleBench22.7%—
LiveBench Reasoning54.8%—
DTBench65.2%—
LiveBench Data Analysis54.5%—
Epoch Capabilities Index130.48—
LiveBench54.3%—

Math Qwen1.5-32B leads

Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 19.6 (#278), Qwen1.5-32B: 30.5 (#207)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok-2 (Dec 2024)Qwen1.5-32B
LMArena Math12831155
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202511.5%—
LiveBench Math54.9%—
MATH Level 563.5%—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)0.7%—

Knowledge Grok-2 (Dec 2024) leads

Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 29.8 (#225), Qwen1.5-32B: 13.5 (#291)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok-2 (Dec 2024)Qwen1.5-32B
GPQA Diamond53.8%30.7%
LMArena Expert12541126
Confabulations20.1%—
MMLU—74.4%

Multilingual Grok-2 (Dec 2024) leads

Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 43.3 (#183), Qwen1.5-32B: 31.6 (#254)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok-2 (Dec 2024)Qwen1.5-32B
LMArena Non-English12821106
LMArena Chinese12891176
LMArena French13171100
LMArena German12871058
LMArena Japanese12441027
LMArena Korean12371007
LMArena Russian12861073
LMArena Spanish12811089

Instruction Following Grok-2 (Dec 2024) leads

Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 67.1 (#197), Qwen1.5-32B: 58.0 (#260)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok-2 (Dec 2024)Qwen1.5-32B
LMArena Instruction Following12701116
LiveBench Instruction Following69.6%—

Long Context Grok-2 (Dec 2024) leads

Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 38.7 (#186), Qwen1.5-32B: 34.7 (#241)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok-2 (Dec 2024)Qwen1.5-32B
LMArena Longer Query12761146

Writing & Preference Grok-2 (Dec 2024) leads

Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 48.8 (#192), Qwen1.5-32B: 34.4 (#266)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok-2 (Dec 2024)Qwen1.5-32B
LMArena Text13051137
LMArena Creative Writing12841083
LMArena Multi-Turn12901140
Short-Story Creative Writing63.6%—
LiveBench Language45.6%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Grok-2 (Dec 2024) better than Qwen1.5-32B?

Grok-2 (Dec 2024) is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.4 to 30.0 on the Noometry Index.

Is Grok-2 (Dec 2024) or Qwen1.5-32B better for coding?

Grok-2 (Dec 2024) scores higher on coding benchmarks: 32.9 versus 31.1 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Grok-2 (Dec 2024) and Qwen1.5-32B share?

18 benchmarks have published results for both models. Grok-2 (Dec 2024) has 34 scored results on Noometry and Qwen1.5-32B has 21.

Related comparisons

Go deeper