Model comparison

Codestral vs Grok-2 (Dec 2024)

Grok-2 (Dec 2024) is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.7 to 30.6 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

Codestral Mistral AI

30.6

Rank #290 Reported

Grok-2 (Dec 2024) xAI

33.7

Rank #239 Confirmed

Summary

  • The widest gap is in coding, where Grok-2 (Dec 2024) leads 33.3 to 27.3.

Side by side

Codestral and Grok-2 (Dec 2024) specifications
CodestralGrok-2 (Dec 2024)
ProviderMistral AIxAI
Noometry Index30.633.7
Released2024-05-292024-08-13
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window256K—
Max output8K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.30—
Output $ / M tokens$0.90—
Results tracked734

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Grok-2 (Dec 2024) leads

Codestral: 27.3 (#321), Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 33.3 (#258)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkCodestralGrok-2 (Dec 2024)
Aider Polyglot11.1%—
WeirdML—22.2%
BigCodeBench Instruct41.8%—
LiveBench Coding—46.4%
LMArena Coding—1287
BigCodeBench Complete52.5%—
ALE-Bench137.78—
HumanEval+73.8%—
MBPP+61.9%—

Reasoning Codestral leads

Codestral: 19.8 (#251), Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 16.9 (#299)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkCodestralGrok-2 (Dec 2024)
SimpleBench—22.7%
Kagi LLM Benchmark32.5%—
LiveBench Reasoning—54.8%
LMArena Hard Prompts—1272
DTBench—65.2%
LiveBench Data Analysis—54.5%
Epoch Capabilities Index—130.48
LiveBench—54.3%

Math Not comparable

Codestral: —, Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 20.8 (#284)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkCodestralGrok-2 (Dec 2024)
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—11.5%
LiveBench Math—54.9%
LMArena Math—1283
MATH Level 5—63.5%
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)—0.7%

Knowledge Not comparable

Codestral: —, Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 29.8 (#233)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkCodestralGrok-2 (Dec 2024)
GPQA Diamond—53.8%
Confabulations—20.1%
LMArena Expert—1254

Multilingual Not comparable

Codestral: —, Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 43.1 (#188)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkCodestralGrok-2 (Dec 2024)
LMArena Non-English—1282
LMArena Chinese—1289
LMArena French—1318
LMArena German—1287
LMArena Japanese—1244
LMArena Korean—1237
LMArena Russian—1286
LMArena Spanish—1281

Instruction Following Not comparable

Codestral: —, Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 66.9 (#202)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkCodestralGrok-2 (Dec 2024)
LiveBench Instruction Following—69.6%
LMArena Instruction Following—1270

Long Context Not comparable

Codestral: —, Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 38.8 (#190)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkCodestralGrok-2 (Dec 2024)
LMArena Longer Query—1276

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Codestral: —, Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 48.6 (#198)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkCodestralGrok-2 (Dec 2024)
LMArena Text—1305
LMArena Creative Writing—1284
Short-Story Creative Writing—63.6%
LMArena Multi-Turn—1290
LiveBench Language—45.6%

Frequently asked questions

Is Codestral better than Grok-2 (Dec 2024)?

Grok-2 (Dec 2024) is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.7 to 30.6 on the Noometry Index.

Is Codestral or Grok-2 (Dec 2024) better for coding?

Grok-2 (Dec 2024) scores higher on coding benchmarks: 33.3 versus 27.3 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Codestral and Grok-2 (Dec 2024) share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Codestral has 7 scored results on Noometry and Grok-2 (Dec 2024) has 34.

Related comparisons

Go deeper