Model comparison

Grok-2 (Dec 2024) vs Phi-1.5

Grok-2 (Dec 2024) has enough public results to be ranked (#239); Phi-1.5 does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.

Grok-2 (Dec 2024) xAI

33.7

Rank #239 Confirmed

Phi-1.5 Microsoft

—

Unranked

Summary

  • They share 1 benchmark with published results for both.
  • Phi-1.5 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Grok-2 (Dec 2024) and Phi-1.5 specifications
Grok-2 (Dec 2024)Phi-1.5
ProviderxAIMicrosoft
Noometry Index33.7—
Released2024-08-132023-09-11
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked347

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 33.3 (#258), Phi-1.5: —

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok-2 (Dec 2024)Phi-1.5
WeirdML22.2%—
LiveBench Coding46.4%—
LMArena Coding1287—

Reasoning Not comparable

Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 16.9 (#299), Phi-1.5: —

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok-2 (Dec 2024)Phi-1.5
Epoch Capabilities Index130.4891.53
SimpleBench22.7%—
LiveBench Reasoning54.8%—
LMArena Hard Prompts1272—
DTBench65.2%—
LiveBench Data Analysis54.5%—
HellaSwag—47.6%
LiveBench54.3%—
WinoGrande—73.4%

Math Not comparable

Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 20.8 (#284), Phi-1.5: —

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok-2 (Dec 2024)Phi-1.5
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202511.5%—
LiveBench Math54.9%—
LMArena Math1283—
MATH Level 563.5%—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)0.7%—

Knowledge Not comparable

Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 29.8 (#233), Phi-1.5: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok-2 (Dec 2024)Phi-1.5
GPQA Diamond53.8%—
Confabulations20.1%—
LMArena Expert1254—
ARC (AI2) Challenge—44.4%
BoolQ—75.8%
MMLU—37.6%
OpenBookQA—37.2%

Multilingual Not comparable

Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 43.1 (#188), Phi-1.5: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok-2 (Dec 2024)Phi-1.5
LMArena Non-English1282—
LMArena Chinese1289—
LMArena French1318—
LMArena German1287—
LMArena Japanese1244—
LMArena Korean1237—
LMArena Russian1286—
LMArena Spanish1281—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 66.9 (#202), Phi-1.5: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok-2 (Dec 2024)Phi-1.5
LiveBench Instruction Following69.6%—
LMArena Instruction Following1270—

Long Context Not comparable

Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 38.8 (#190), Phi-1.5: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok-2 (Dec 2024)Phi-1.5
LMArena Longer Query1276—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 48.6 (#198), Phi-1.5: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok-2 (Dec 2024)Phi-1.5
LMArena Text1305—
LMArena Creative Writing1284—
Short-Story Creative Writing63.6%—
LMArena Multi-Turn1290—
LiveBench Language45.6%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Grok-2 (Dec 2024) better than Phi-1.5?

Grok-2 (Dec 2024) has enough public results to be ranked (#239); Phi-1.5 does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

How many benchmarks do Grok-2 (Dec 2024) and Phi-1.5 share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. Grok-2 (Dec 2024) has 34 scored results on Noometry and Phi-1.5 has 7.

Related comparisons

Go deeper