Model comparison

Grok-2 (Dec 2024) vs MiMo-V2.5-Pro

MiMo-V2.5-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.2 to 33.7 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 18 shared benchmarks.

Grok-2 (Dec 2024) xAI

33.7

Rank #239 Confirmed

MiMo-V2.5-Pro Xiaomi

45.2

Rank #74 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 18 benchmarks with published results for both. Grok-2 (Dec 2024) scores higher in 0 categories and MiMo-V2.5-Pro in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads 40.0 to 20.8.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is DTBench: 65.2% for Grok-2 (Dec 2024) and 84.5% for MiMo-V2.5-Pro.
  • MiMo-V2.5-Pro has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Grok-2 (Dec 2024) and MiMo-V2.5-Pro specifications
Grok-2 (Dec 2024)MiMo-V2.5-Pro
ProviderxAIXiaomi
Noometry Index33.745.2
Released2024-08-132026-04-22
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window—1.05M
Max output—131K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.43
Output $ / M tokens—$0.87
Results tracked3427

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads

Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 33.3 (#258), MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 47.4 (#60)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok-2 (Dec 2024)MiMo-V2.5-Pro
LMArena Coding12871503
LMArena WebDev—1479
SciCode—50.2%
WeirdML22.2%—
LiveBench Coding46.4%—
ALE-Bench—899.8

Reasoning MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads

Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 16.9 (#299), MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 26.8 (#130)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok-2 (Dec 2024)MiMo-V2.5-Pro
LMArena Hard Prompts12721488
DTBench65.2%84.5%
SimpleBench22.7%—
NYT Connections (extended)—34.4%
CritPt—4%
LiveBench Reasoning54.8%—
LiveBench Data Analysis54.5%—
LMCA—29.5%
Epoch Capabilities Index130.48—
LiveBench54.3%—

Math MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads

Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 20.8 (#284), MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 40.0 (#96)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok-2 (Dec 2024)MiMo-V2.5-Pro
LMArena Math12831481
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202511.5%—
ProofBench—22%
LiveBench Math54.9%—
MATH Level 563.5%—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)0.7%—

Knowledge MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads

Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 29.8 (#233), MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 42.2 (#98)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok-2 (Dec 2024)MiMo-V2.5-Pro
LMArena Expert12541503
GPQA Diamond53.8%—
Confabulations20.1%—

Multilingual MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads

Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 43.1 (#188), MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 55.1 (#34)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok-2 (Dec 2024)MiMo-V2.5-Pro
LMArena Non-English12821449
LMArena Chinese12891507
LMArena French13181488
LMArena German12871458
LMArena Japanese12441412
LMArena Korean12371437
LMArena Russian12861450
LMArena Spanish12811471

Instruction Following MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads

Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 66.9 (#202), MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 77.5 (#21)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok-2 (Dec 2024)MiMo-V2.5-Pro
LMArena Instruction Following12701477
LiveBench Instruction Following69.6%—

Long Context MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads

Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 38.8 (#190), MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 45.4 (#37)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok-2 (Dec 2024)MiMo-V2.5-Pro
LMArena Longer Query12761483

Writing & Preference MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads

Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 48.6 (#198), MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 65.3 (#49)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok-2 (Dec 2024)MiMo-V2.5-Pro
LMArena Text13051465
LMArena Creative Writing12841440
LMArena Multi-Turn12901477
Short-Story Creative Writing63.6%—
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—1493
EQ-Bench 4—1208
LiveBench Language45.6%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Grok-2 (Dec 2024) better than MiMo-V2.5-Pro?

MiMo-V2.5-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.2 to 33.7 on the Noometry Index.

Is Grok-2 (Dec 2024) or MiMo-V2.5-Pro better for coding?

MiMo-V2.5-Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 47.4 versus 33.3 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Grok-2 (Dec 2024) and MiMo-V2.5-Pro share?

18 benchmarks have published results for both models. Grok-2 (Dec 2024) has 34 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2.5-Pro has 27.

Related comparisons

Go deeper