Noometry

Model comparison

Grok-2 (Dec 2024) vs Qwen3.7 Plus

Qwen3.7 Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.3 to 33.7 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 21 shared benchmarks.

Grok-2 (Dec 2024) xAI

33.7

Rank #239 Confirmed

Qwen3.7 Plus Alibaba (Qwen)

45.3

Rank #72 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 21 benchmarks with published results for both. Grok-2 (Dec 2024) scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3.7 Plus in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Qwen3.7 Plus leads 50.5 to 20.8.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 11.5% for Grok-2 (Dec 2024) and 93.3% for Qwen3.7 Plus.

Side by side

Grok-2 (Dec 2024)Qwen3.7 Plus
ProviderxAIAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index33.745.3
Released2024-08-132026-06-02
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window—1M
Max output—131K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.40
Output $ / M tokens—$1.60
Results tracked3432

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Qwen3.7 Plus leads

Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 33.3 (#258), Qwen3.7 Plus: 36.6 (#206)

BenchmarkGrok-2 (Dec 2024)Qwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Coding12871473
FrontierCode—10.2%
SciCode—45.5%
WeirdML22.2%—
LiveBench Coding46.4%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Grok-2 (Dec 2024): —, Qwen3.7 Plus: 21.4 (#138)

BenchmarkGrok-2 (Dec 2024)Qwen3.7 Plus
OSWorld 2.0—2.8%

Reasoning Qwen3.7 Plus leads

Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 16.9 (#299), Qwen3.7 Plus: 39.3 (#59)

BenchmarkGrok-2 (Dec 2024)Qwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Hard Prompts12721460
DTBench65.2%84%
Epoch Capabilities Index130.48147.37
SimpleBench22.7%—
NYT Connections (extended)—74.8%
CritPt—9.1%
Chess Puzzles—24%
LiveBench Reasoning54.8%—
Mystery Game Puzzles—17%
LiveBench Data Analysis54.5%—
LMCA—37.6%
LiveBench54.3%—

Math Qwen3.7 Plus leads

Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 20.8 (#284), Qwen3.7 Plus: 50.5 (#56)

BenchmarkGrok-2 (Dec 2024)Qwen3.7 Plus
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202511.5%93.3%
LMArena Math12831466
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—34.4%
LiveBench Math54.9%—
MATH Level 563.5%—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)0.7%—

Knowledge Qwen3.7 Plus leads

Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 29.8 (#233), Qwen3.7 Plus: 54.9 (#51)

BenchmarkGrok-2 (Dec 2024)Qwen3.7 Plus
GPQA Diamond53.8%87.9%
LMArena Expert12541467
Confabulations20.1%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Grok-2 (Dec 2024): —, Qwen3.7 Plus: 41.8 (#33)

BenchmarkGrok-2 (Dec 2024)Qwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Vision—1279
LMArena Document—1444

Multilingual Qwen3.7 Plus leads

Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 43.1 (#188), Qwen3.7 Plus: 54.8 (#38)

BenchmarkGrok-2 (Dec 2024)Qwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Non-English12821445
LMArena Chinese12891510
LMArena French13181473
LMArena German12871471
LMArena Japanese12441413
LMArena Korean12371415
LMArena Russian12861457
LMArena Spanish12811457

Instruction Following Qwen3.7 Plus leads

Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 66.9 (#202), Qwen3.7 Plus: 75.8 (#52)

BenchmarkGrok-2 (Dec 2024)Qwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Instruction Following12701440
LiveBench Instruction Following69.6%—

Long Context Qwen3.7 Plus leads

Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 38.8 (#190), Qwen3.7 Plus: 44.5 (#65)

BenchmarkGrok-2 (Dec 2024)Qwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Longer Query12761455

Writing & Preference Qwen3.7 Plus leads

Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 48.6 (#198), Qwen3.7 Plus: 64.3 (#56)

BenchmarkGrok-2 (Dec 2024)Qwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Text13051455
LMArena Creative Writing12841439
LMArena Multi-Turn12901460
Short-Story Creative Writing63.6%—
LiveBench Language45.6%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Grok-2 (Dec 2024) better than Qwen3.7 Plus?

Qwen3.7 Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.3 to 33.7 on the Noometry Index.

Is Grok-2 (Dec 2024) or Qwen3.7 Plus better for coding?

Qwen3.7 Plus scores higher on coding benchmarks: 36.6 versus 33.3 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Grok-2 (Dec 2024) and Qwen3.7 Plus share?

21 benchmarks have published results for both models. Grok-2 (Dec 2024) has 34 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.7 Plus has 32.

Related comparisons

Go deeper