Model comparison

Grok-2 (Dec 2024) vs Llama 2-34B

Grok-2 (Dec 2024) has enough public results to be ranked (#233); Llama 2-34B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.

Grok-2 (Dec 2024) xAI

33.4

Rank #233 Confirmed

Llama 2-34B Meta

—

Unranked

Summary

  • They share 1 benchmark with published results for both.

Side by side

Grok-2 (Dec 2024) and Llama 2-34B specifications
Grok-2 (Dec 2024)Llama 2-34B
ProviderxAIMeta
Noometry Index33.4—
Released2024-08-132023-07-18
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked3410

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 32.9 (#254), Llama 2-34B: —

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok-2 (Dec 2024)Llama 2-34B
WeirdML22.2%—
LiveBench Coding46.4%—
LMArena Coding1288—

Reasoning Not comparable

Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 16.4 (#294), Llama 2-34B: —

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok-2 (Dec 2024)Llama 2-34B
Epoch Capabilities Index130.48104.81
SimpleBench22.7%—
LiveBench Reasoning54.8%—
LMArena Hard Prompts1272—
DTBench65.2%—
LiveBench Data Analysis54.5%—
BIG-Bench Hard—44.1%
LiveBench54.3%—
PIQA—81.9%
WinoGrande—76.7%

Math Not comparable

Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 19.6 (#278), Llama 2-34B: —

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok-2 (Dec 2024)Llama 2-34B
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202511.5%—
LiveBench Math54.9%—
LMArena Math1283—
MATH Level 563.5%—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)0.7%—
GSM8K—42.2%

Knowledge Not comparable

Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 29.8 (#225), Llama 2-34B: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok-2 (Dec 2024)Llama 2-34B
GPQA Diamond53.8%—
Confabulations20.1%—
LMArena Expert1254—
ARC (AI2) Challenge—54.5%
BoolQ—83.7%
MMLU—62.6%
OpenBookQA—58.2%
TriviaQA—84.6%

Multilingual Not comparable

Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 43.3 (#183), Llama 2-34B: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok-2 (Dec 2024)Llama 2-34B
LMArena Non-English1282—
LMArena Chinese1289—
LMArena French1317—
LMArena German1287—
LMArena Japanese1244—
LMArena Korean1237—
LMArena Russian1286—
LMArena Spanish1281—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 67.1 (#197), Llama 2-34B: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok-2 (Dec 2024)Llama 2-34B
LiveBench Instruction Following69.6%—
LMArena Instruction Following1270—

Long Context Not comparable

Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 38.7 (#186), Llama 2-34B: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok-2 (Dec 2024)Llama 2-34B
LMArena Longer Query1276—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 48.8 (#192), Llama 2-34B: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok-2 (Dec 2024)Llama 2-34B
LMArena Text1305—
LMArena Creative Writing1284—
Short-Story Creative Writing63.6%—
LMArena Multi-Turn1290—
LiveBench Language45.6%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Grok-2 (Dec 2024) better than Llama 2-34B?

Grok-2 (Dec 2024) has enough public results to be ranked (#233); Llama 2-34B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

How many benchmarks do Grok-2 (Dec 2024) and Llama 2-34B share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. Grok-2 (Dec 2024) has 34 scored results on Noometry and Llama 2-34B has 10.

Related comparisons

Go deeper