Model comparison

Grok-2 (Dec 2024) vs Kimi K2.5 Instant

Kimi K2.5 Instant is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.6 to 33.7 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 16 shared benchmarks.

Grok-2 (Dec 2024) xAI

33.7

Rank #239 Confirmed

Kimi K2.5 Instant Moonshot AI

43.6

Rank #89 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 16 benchmarks with published results for both. Grok-2 (Dec 2024) scores higher in 0 categories and Kimi K2.5 Instant in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Kimi K2.5 Instant leads 39.4 to 20.8.
  • Kimi K2.5 Instant has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Grok-2 (Dec 2024) and Kimi K2.5 Instant specifications
Grok-2 (Dec 2024)Kimi K2.5 Instant
ProviderxAIMoonshot AI
Noometry Index33.743.6
Released2024-08-13—
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked3418

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Kimi K2.5 Instant leads

Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 33.3 (#258), Kimi K2.5 Instant: 42.6 (#97)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok-2 (Dec 2024)Kimi K2.5 Instant
LMArena Coding12871484
LMArena WebDev—1404
WeirdML22.2%—
LiveBench Coding46.4%—

Reasoning Kimi K2.5 Instant leads

Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 16.9 (#299), Kimi K2.5 Instant: 29.7 (#90)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok-2 (Dec 2024)Kimi K2.5 Instant
LMArena Hard Prompts12721443
SimpleBench22.7%—
LiveBench Reasoning54.8%—
DTBench65.2%—
LiveBench Data Analysis54.5%—
Epoch Capabilities Index130.48—
LiveBench54.3%—

Math Kimi K2.5 Instant leads

Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 20.8 (#284), Kimi K2.5 Instant: 39.4 (#105)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok-2 (Dec 2024)Kimi K2.5 Instant
LMArena Math12831442
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202511.5%—
LiveBench Math54.9%—
MATH Level 563.5%—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)0.7%—

Knowledge Kimi K2.5 Instant leads

Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 29.8 (#233), Kimi K2.5 Instant: 40.2 (#123)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok-2 (Dec 2024)Kimi K2.5 Instant
LMArena Expert12541440
GPQA Diamond53.8%—
Confabulations20.1%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Grok-2 (Dec 2024): —, Kimi K2.5 Instant: 40.2 (#50)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok-2 (Dec 2024)Kimi K2.5 Instant
LMArena Vision—1254

Multilingual Kimi K2.5 Instant leads

Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 43.1 (#188), Kimi K2.5 Instant: 52.0 (#94)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok-2 (Dec 2024)Kimi K2.5 Instant
LMArena Non-English12821406
LMArena Chinese12891449
LMArena French13181403
LMArena German12871413
LMArena Korean12371378
LMArena Russian12861404
LMArena Spanish12811447
LMArena Japanese1244—

Instruction Following Kimi K2.5 Instant leads

Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 66.9 (#202), Kimi K2.5 Instant: 75.3 (#65)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok-2 (Dec 2024)Kimi K2.5 Instant
LMArena Instruction Following12701430
LiveBench Instruction Following69.6%—

Long Context Kimi K2.5 Instant leads

Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 38.8 (#190), Kimi K2.5 Instant: 43.9 (#83)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok-2 (Dec 2024)Kimi K2.5 Instant
LMArena Longer Query12761435

Writing & Preference Kimi K2.5 Instant leads

Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 48.6 (#198), Kimi K2.5 Instant: 60.6 (#95)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok-2 (Dec 2024)Kimi K2.5 Instant
LMArena Text13051420
LMArena Creative Writing12841381
LMArena Multi-Turn12901427
Short-Story Creative Writing63.6%—
LiveBench Language45.6%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Grok-2 (Dec 2024) better than Kimi K2.5 Instant?

Kimi K2.5 Instant is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.6 to 33.7 on the Noometry Index.

Is Grok-2 (Dec 2024) or Kimi K2.5 Instant better for coding?

Kimi K2.5 Instant scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.6 versus 33.3 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Grok-2 (Dec 2024) and Kimi K2.5 Instant share?

16 benchmarks have published results for both models. Grok-2 (Dec 2024) has 34 scored results on Noometry and Kimi K2.5 Instant has 18.

Related comparisons

Go deeper