Model comparison
Codellama 70b Instruct vs Kimi K2.5 Instant
Kimi K2.5 Instant is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.6 to 33.7 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 4 shared benchmarks.
MetaSummary
- They share 4 benchmarks with published results for both. Codellama 70b Instruct scores higher in 0 categories and Kimi K2.5 Instant in 5 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in multilingual, where Kimi K2.5 Instant leads 52.0 to 24.8.
Side by side
| Codellama 70b Instruct | Kimi K2.5 Instant | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Moonshot AI |
| Noometry Index | 33.7 | 43.6 |
| Released | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 7 | 18 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Kimi K2.5 Instant leads
Codellama 70b Instruct: 37.6 (#193), Kimi K2.5 Instant: 42.6 (#97)
| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Kimi K2.5 Instant |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1404 |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 40.7% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1484 |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 49.6% | — |
| HumanEval+ | 65.9% | — |
Reasoning Kimi K2.5 Instant leads
Codellama 70b Instruct: 20.1 (#242), Kimi K2.5 Instant: 29.7 (#90)
| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Kimi K2.5 Instant |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1052 | 1443 |
Math Not comparable
Codellama 70b Instruct: —, Kimi K2.5 Instant: 39.4 (#105)
| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Kimi K2.5 Instant |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1442 |
Knowledge Not comparable
Codellama 70b Instruct: —, Kimi K2.5 Instant: 40.2 (#123)
| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Kimi K2.5 Instant |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1440 |
Multimodal Not comparable
Codellama 70b Instruct: —, Kimi K2.5 Instant: 40.2 (#50)
| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Kimi K2.5 Instant |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1254 |
Multilingual Kimi K2.5 Instant leads
Codellama 70b Instruct: 24.8 (#288), Kimi K2.5 Instant: 52.0 (#94)
| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Kimi K2.5 Instant |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 992 | 1406 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1449 |
| LMArena French | — | 1403 |
| LMArena German | — | 1413 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1378 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1404 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1447 |
Instruction Following Kimi K2.5 Instant leads
Codellama 70b Instruct: 51.9 (#293), Kimi K2.5 Instant: 75.3 (#65)
| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Kimi K2.5 Instant |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1024 | 1430 |
Long Context Not comparable
Codellama 70b Instruct: —, Kimi K2.5 Instant: 43.9 (#83)
| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Kimi K2.5 Instant |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1435 |
Writing & Preference Kimi K2.5 Instant leads
Codellama 70b Instruct: 33.4 (#277), Kimi K2.5 Instant: 60.6 (#95)
| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Kimi K2.5 Instant |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1057 | 1420 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1381 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1427 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Codellama 70b Instruct better than Kimi K2.5 Instant?
Kimi K2.5 Instant is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.6 to 33.7 on the Noometry Index.
Is Codellama 70b Instruct or Kimi K2.5 Instant better for coding?
Kimi K2.5 Instant scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.6 versus 37.6 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Codellama 70b Instruct and Kimi K2.5 Instant share?
4 benchmarks have published results for both models. Codellama 70b Instruct has 7 scored results on Noometry and Kimi K2.5 Instant has 18.