Model comparison

Grok-2 (Dec 2024) vs Hunyuan Vision 1.5

Hunyuan Vision 1.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.1 to 33.7 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 8 shared benchmarks.

Grok-2 (Dec 2024) xAI

33.7

Rank #239 Confirmed

Hunyuan Vision 1.5 Tencent

43.1

Rank #98 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 8 benchmarks with published results for both. Grok-2 (Dec 2024) scores higher in 0 categories and Hunyuan Vision 1.5 in 6 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Hunyuan Vision 1.5 leads 28.9 to 16.9.

Side by side

Grok-2 (Dec 2024) and Hunyuan Vision 1.5 specifications
Grok-2 (Dec 2024)Hunyuan Vision 1.5
ProviderxAITencent
Noometry Index33.743.1
Released2024-08-13—
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked349

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Hunyuan Vision 1.5 leads

Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 33.3 (#258), Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 41.8 (#119)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok-2 (Dec 2024)Hunyuan Vision 1.5
LMArena Coding12871418
WeirdML22.2%—
LiveBench Coding46.4%—

Reasoning Hunyuan Vision 1.5 leads

Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 16.9 (#299), Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 28.9 (#97)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok-2 (Dec 2024)Hunyuan Vision 1.5
LMArena Hard Prompts12721416
SimpleBench22.7%—
LiveBench Reasoning54.8%—
DTBench65.2%—
LiveBench Data Analysis54.5%—
Epoch Capabilities Index130.48—
LiveBench54.3%—

Math Not comparable

Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 20.8 (#284), Hunyuan Vision 1.5: —

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok-2 (Dec 2024)Hunyuan Vision 1.5
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202511.5%—
LiveBench Math54.9%—
LMArena Math1283—
MATH Level 563.5%—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)0.7%—

Knowledge Not comparable

Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 29.8 (#233), Hunyuan Vision 1.5: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok-2 (Dec 2024)Hunyuan Vision 1.5
GPQA Diamond53.8%—
Confabulations20.1%—
LMArena Expert1254—

Multimodal Not comparable

Grok-2 (Dec 2024): —, Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 35.7 (#84)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok-2 (Dec 2024)Hunyuan Vision 1.5
LMArena Vision—1180

Multilingual Hunyuan Vision 1.5 leads

Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 43.1 (#188), Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 50.3 (#125)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok-2 (Dec 2024)Hunyuan Vision 1.5
LMArena Non-English12821382
LMArena Chinese1289—
LMArena French1318—
LMArena German1287—
LMArena Japanese1244—
LMArena Korean1237—
LMArena Russian1286—
LMArena Spanish1281—

Instruction Following Hunyuan Vision 1.5 leads

Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 66.9 (#202), Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 73.7 (#117)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok-2 (Dec 2024)Hunyuan Vision 1.5
LMArena Instruction Following12701397
LiveBench Instruction Following69.6%—

Long Context Hunyuan Vision 1.5 leads

Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 38.8 (#190), Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 42.9 (#115)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok-2 (Dec 2024)Hunyuan Vision 1.5
LMArena Longer Query12761404

Writing & Preference Hunyuan Vision 1.5 leads

Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 48.6 (#198), Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 60.1 (#100)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok-2 (Dec 2024)Hunyuan Vision 1.5
LMArena Text13051405
LMArena Creative Writing12841388
LMArena Multi-Turn12901422
Short-Story Creative Writing63.6%—
LiveBench Language45.6%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Grok-2 (Dec 2024) better than Hunyuan Vision 1.5?

Hunyuan Vision 1.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.1 to 33.7 on the Noometry Index.

Is Grok-2 (Dec 2024) or Hunyuan Vision 1.5 better for coding?

Hunyuan Vision 1.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.8 versus 33.3 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Grok-2 (Dec 2024) and Hunyuan Vision 1.5 share?

8 benchmarks have published results for both models. Grok-2 (Dec 2024) has 34 scored results on Noometry and Hunyuan Vision 1.5 has 9.

Related comparisons

Go deeper