Model comparison

Granite 4.2 3b vs Grok-2 (Dec 2024)

Granite 4.2 3b is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.0 to 33.4 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 11 shared benchmarks.

Granite 4.2 3b IBM

39.0

Rank #163 Confirmed

Grok-2 (Dec 2024) xAI

33.4

Rank #233 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Granite 4.2 3b scores higher in 5 categories and Grok-2 (Dec 2024) in 2 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Granite 4.2 3b leads 25.0 to 16.4.
  • Granite 4.2 3b has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Granite 4.2 3b and Grok-2 (Dec 2024) specifications
Granite 4.2 3bGrok-2 (Dec 2024)
ProviderIBMxAI
Noometry Index39.033.4
Released—2024-08-13
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked1134

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Granite 4.2 3b leads

Granite 4.2 3b: 39.4 (#146), Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 32.9 (#254)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 3bGrok-2 (Dec 2024)
LMArena Coding13631288
WeirdML—22.2%
LiveBench Coding—46.4%

Reasoning Granite 4.2 3b leads

Granite 4.2 3b: 25.0 (#136), Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 16.4 (#294)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 3bGrok-2 (Dec 2024)
LMArena Hard Prompts13081272
SimpleBench—22.7%
LiveBench Reasoning—54.8%
DTBench—65.2%
LiveBench Data Analysis—54.5%
Epoch Capabilities Index—130.48
LiveBench—54.3%

Math Not comparable

Granite 4.2 3b: —, Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 19.6 (#278)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 3bGrok-2 (Dec 2024)
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—11.5%
LiveBench Math—54.9%
LMArena Math—1283
MATH Level 5—63.5%
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)—0.7%

Knowledge Granite 4.2 3b leads

Granite 4.2 3b: 35.6 (#169), Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 29.8 (#225)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 3bGrok-2 (Dec 2024)
LMArena Expert13131254
GPQA Diamond—53.8%
Confabulations—20.1%

Multilingual Too close to call

Granite 4.2 3b: 42.4 (#193), Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 43.3 (#183)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 3bGrok-2 (Dec 2024)
LMArena Non-English12681282
LMArena Chinese12681289
LMArena Russian12491286
LMArena French—1317
LMArena German—1287
LMArena Japanese—1244
LMArena Korean—1237
LMArena Spanish—1281

Instruction Following Too close to call

Granite 4.2 3b: 67.2 (#195), Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 67.1 (#197)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 3bGrok-2 (Dec 2024)
LMArena Instruction Following12711270
LiveBench Instruction Following—69.6%

Long Context Too close to call

Granite 4.2 3b: 39.3 (#179), Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 38.7 (#186)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 3bGrok-2 (Dec 2024)
LMArena Longer Query12931276

Writing & Preference Too close to call

Granite 4.2 3b: 47.9 (#202), Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 48.8 (#192)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 3bGrok-2 (Dec 2024)
LMArena Text12951305
LMArena Creative Writing12151284
LMArena Multi-Turn12931290
Short-Story Creative Writing—63.6%
LiveBench Language—45.6%

Frequently asked questions

Is Granite 4.2 3b better than Grok-2 (Dec 2024)?

Granite 4.2 3b is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.0 to 33.4 on the Noometry Index.

Is Granite 4.2 3b or Grok-2 (Dec 2024) better for coding?

Granite 4.2 3b scores higher on coding benchmarks: 39.4 versus 32.9 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Granite 4.2 3b and Grok-2 (Dec 2024) share?

11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Granite 4.2 3b has 11 scored results on Noometry and Grok-2 (Dec 2024) has 34.

Related comparisons

Go deeper