Model comparison
Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 vs Qwen2.5 32B Instruct
Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.7 to 30.1 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- The widest gap is in math, where Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 leads 35.4 to 16.2.
- Qwen2.5 32B Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | xAI | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 37.7 | 30.1 |
| Released | 2024-08-13 | 2024-09 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | 131K |
| Max output | — | 8K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.70 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $2.80 |
| Results tracked | 17 | 7 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Qwen2.5 32B Instruct leads
Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 37.0 (#199), Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: 38.7 (#169)
| Benchmark | Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 45% |
| LMArena Coding | 1269 | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 52.3% |
Reasoning Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 leads
Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 24.8 (#159), Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: 19.2 (#266)
| Benchmark | Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Chess Puzzles | — | 0% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1255 | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 128.52 |
Math Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 leads
Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 35.4 (#185), Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: 16.2 (#296)
| Benchmark | Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 7.4% |
| LMArena Math | 1265 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 56.1% |
Knowledge Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 leads
Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 33.9 (#200), Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: 24.9 (#266)
| Benchmark | Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 46.1% |
| LMArena Expert | 1238 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 41.4 (#208), Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1257 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1262 | — |
| LMArena French | 1286 | — |
| LMArena German | 1273 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1213 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1195 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1261 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1279 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 65.5 (#220), Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1245 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 38.4 (#196), Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1266 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 47.3 (#211), Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1281 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1242 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1265 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 better than Qwen2.5 32B Instruct?
Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.7 to 30.1 on the Noometry Index.
Is Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 or Qwen2.5 32B Instruct better for coding?
Qwen2.5 32B Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.7 versus 37.0 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 and Qwen2.5 32B Instruct share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 has 17 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5 32B Instruct has 7.