Model comparison
Gemini Advanced 0514 vs Qwen2.5 32B Instruct
Gemini Advanced 0514 is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.7 to 30.1 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Google
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- The widest gap is in math, where Gemini Advanced 0514 leads 35.5 to 16.2.
- Qwen2.5 32B Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemini Advanced 0514 | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | |
| Noometry Index | 37.7 | 30.1 |
| Released | — | 2024-09 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | 131K |
| Max output | — | 8K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.70 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $2.80 |
| Results tracked | 17 | 7 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Qwen2.5 32B Instruct leads
Gemini Advanced 0514: 36.6 (#205), Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: 38.7 (#169)
| Benchmark | Gemini Advanced 0514 | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 45% |
| LMArena Coding | 1255 | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 52.3% |
Reasoning Gemini Advanced 0514 leads
Gemini Advanced 0514: 24.6 (#160), Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: 19.2 (#266)
| Benchmark | Gemini Advanced 0514 | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Chess Puzzles | — | 0% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1248 | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 128.52 |
Math Gemini Advanced 0514 leads
Gemini Advanced 0514: 35.5 (#181), Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: 16.2 (#296)
| Benchmark | Gemini Advanced 0514 | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 7.4% |
| LMArena Math | 1272 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 56.1% |
Knowledge Gemini Advanced 0514 leads
Gemini Advanced 0514: 33.3 (#205), Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: 24.9 (#266)
| Benchmark | Gemini Advanced 0514 | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 46.1% |
| LMArena Expert | 1215 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Gemini Advanced 0514: 42.6 (#192), Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Gemini Advanced 0514 | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1274 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1274 | — |
| LMArena French | 1307 | — |
| LMArena German | 1275 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1242 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1232 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1283 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1242 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Gemini Advanced 0514: 66.0 (#212), Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Gemini Advanced 0514 | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1253 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Gemini Advanced 0514: 38.0 (#207), Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Gemini Advanced 0514 | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1253 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Gemini Advanced 0514: 48.5 (#200), Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Gemini Advanced 0514 | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1279 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1284 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1269 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini Advanced 0514 better than Qwen2.5 32B Instruct?
Gemini Advanced 0514 is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.7 to 30.1 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemini Advanced 0514 or Qwen2.5 32B Instruct better for coding?
Qwen2.5 32B Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.7 versus 36.6 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemini Advanced 0514 and Qwen2.5 32B Instruct share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini Advanced 0514 has 17 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5 32B Instruct has 7.