Model comparison
Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 vs Llama 2-7B
Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.0 to 28.6 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 15 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 15 benchmarks with published results for both. Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 scores higher in 8 categories and Llama 2-7B in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 leads 47.5 to 28.1.
- Llama 2-7B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 | Llama 2-7B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | xAI | Meta |
| Noometry Index | 37.0 | 28.6 |
| Released | 2024-08-13 | 2023-07-18 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 17 | 29 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 leads
Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 36.4 (#194), Llama 2-7B: 28.7 (#302)
| Benchmark | Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 | Llama 2-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1269 | 1002 |
Reasoning Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 leads
Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 23.7 (#162), Llama 2-7B: 15.1 (#309)
| Benchmark | Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 | Llama 2-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1255 | 1009 |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 0% |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 39.2% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 98.54 |
| HellaSwag | — | 77.2% |
| LAMBADA | — | 73.3% |
| PIQA | — | 78.8% |
| WinoGrande | — | 69.2% |
Math Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 leads
Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 32.8 (#185), Llama 2-7B: 28.2 (#231)
| Benchmark | Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 | Llama 2-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1265 | 1042 |
| GSM8K | — | 16.7% |
Knowledge Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 leads
Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 33.4 (#195), Llama 2-7B: 27.7 (#243)
| Benchmark | Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 | Llama 2-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1238 | 1036 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 45.9% |
| BoolQ | — | 77.9% |
| MMLU | — | 45.8% |
| OpenBookQA | — | 58.6% |
| TriviaQA | — | 73.7% |
Multimodal Not comparable
Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: —, Llama 2-7B: —
| Benchmark | Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 | Llama 2-7B |
|---|---|---|
| ScienceQA | — | 43.1% |
Multilingual Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 leads
Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 41.6 (#203), Llama 2-7B: 23.9 (#288)
| Benchmark | Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 | Llama 2-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1257 | 973 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1262 | 973 |
| LMArena French | 1285 | 969 |
| LMArena German | 1273 | 978 |
| LMArena Russian | 1261 | 995 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1278 | 1007 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1213 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1195 | — |
Instruction Following Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 leads
Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 65.7 (#215), Llama 2-7B: 51.0 (#293)
| Benchmark | Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 | Llama 2-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1245 | 1006 |
Long Context Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 leads
Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 38.4 (#191), Llama 2-7B: 30.4 (#282)
| Benchmark | Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 | Llama 2-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1267 | 999 |
Writing & Preference Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 leads
Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 47.5 (#207), Llama 2-7B: 28.1 (#293)
| Benchmark | Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 | Llama 2-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1281 | 1053 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1242 | 1033 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1265 | 1029 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 better than Llama 2-7B?
Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.0 to 28.6 on the Noometry Index.
Is Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 or Llama 2-7B better for coding?
Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 36.4 versus 28.7 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 and Llama 2-7B share?
15 benchmarks have published results for both models. Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 has 17 scored results on Noometry and Llama 2-7B has 29.