Model comparison
Gemma 1.1 2b IT vs Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13
Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.0 to 28.8 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 14 shared benchmarks.
GoogleSummary
- They share 14 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 1.1 2b IT scores higher in 0 categories and Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 leads 47.5 to 25.3.
- Gemma 1.1 2b IT has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | xAI | |
| Noometry Index | 28.8 | 37.0 |
| Released | — | 2024-08-13 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 16 | 17 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 leads
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 29.6 (#294), Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 36.4 (#194)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1034 | 1269 |
| HumanEval+ | 17.7% | — |
| MBPP+ | 23.3% | — |
Reasoning Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 leads
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 18.2 (#268), Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 23.7 (#162)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1005 | 1255 |
Math Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 leads
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 28.3 (#230), Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 32.8 (#185)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1047 | 1265 |
Knowledge Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 leads
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 26.0 (#255), Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 33.4 (#195)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 970 | 1238 |
Multilingual Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 leads
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 24.7 (#284), Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 41.6 (#203)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 988 | 1257 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1011 | 1262 |
| LMArena German | 944 | 1273 |
| LMArena Korean | 899 | 1195 |
| LMArena Russian | 990 | 1261 |
| LMArena French | — | 1285 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1213 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1278 |
Instruction Following Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 leads
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 50.1 (#294), Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 65.7 (#215)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 992 | 1245 |
Long Context Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 leads
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 30.5 (#281), Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 38.4 (#191)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1003 | 1267 |
Writing & Preference Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 leads
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 25.3 (#301), Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 47.5 (#207)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1022 | 1281 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 998 | 1242 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 958 | 1265 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemma 1.1 2b IT better than Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13?
Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.0 to 28.8 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemma 1.1 2b IT or Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 better for coding?
Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 36.4 versus 29.6 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemma 1.1 2b IT and Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 share?
14 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 1.1 2b IT has 16 scored results on Noometry and Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 has 17.