Model comparison

Granite 4.2 8B vs Qwen3-30B-A3B

Granite 4.2 8B is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.5 to 38.9 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 11 shared benchmarks.

Granite 4.2 8B IBM

40.5

Rank #148 Confirmed

Qwen3-30B-A3B Alibaba (Qwen)

38.9

Rank #179 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Granite 4.2 8B scores higher in 3 categories and Qwen3-30B-A3B in 4 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in long context, where Granite 4.2 8B leads 40.3 to 31.0.
  • Granite 4.2 8B is cheaper at $0.06 / $0.25 per million input/output tokens, against $0.12 / $0.50 for Qwen3-30B-A3B.
  • Granite 4.2 8B accepts more context: 131K tokens versus 41K.

Side by side

Granite 4.2 8B and Qwen3-30B-A3B specifications
Granite 4.2 8BQwen3-30B-A3B
ProviderIBMAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index40.538.9
Released—2025-04-28
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window131K41K
Max output118K16K
Input $ / M tokens$0.06$0.12
Output $ / M tokens$0.25$0.50
Results tracked1132

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Granite 4.2 8B leads

Granite 4.2 8B: 40.5 (#137), Qwen3-30B-A3B: 37.5 (#194)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 8BQwen3-30B-A3B
LMArena Coding13801416
SciCode—33.3%
WeirdML—29.8%

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Granite 4.2 8B: —, Qwen3-30B-A3B: 29.8 (#82)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 8BQwen3-30B-A3B
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard—41.4%

Reasoning Granite 4.2 8B leads

Granite 4.2 8B: 26.6 (#131), Qwen3-30B-A3B: 22.2 (#204)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 8BQwen3-30B-A3B
LMArena Hard Prompts13291398
Kagi LLM Benchmark—54.9%
CritPt—0.3%
Chess Puzzles—8%
DTBench—69.3%
LMCA—22.4%
Epoch Capabilities Index—139.63

Math Not comparable

Granite 4.2 8B: —, Qwen3-30B-A3B: 37.4 (#157)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 8BQwen3-30B-A3B
MathArena Final-Answer Competitions—47.8%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—70.3%
LMArena Math—1394

Knowledge Qwen3-30B-A3B leads

Granite 4.2 8B: 38.4 (#145), Qwen3-30B-A3B: 41.8 (#105)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 8BQwen3-30B-A3B
LMArena Expert13841396
GPQA Diamond—70.1%
Confabulations—12.3%

Multilingual Qwen3-30B-A3B leads

Granite 4.2 8B: 44.5 (#178), Qwen3-30B-A3B: 49.5 (#132)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 8BQwen3-30B-A3B
LMArena Non-English13021372
LMArena Chinese13661433
LMArena Russian12851370
LMArena French—1418
LMArena German—1380
LMArena Japanese—1337
LMArena Korean—1331
LMArena Spanish—1404

Instruction Following Qwen3-30B-A3B leads

Granite 4.2 8B: 68.7 (#184), Qwen3-30B-A3B: 72.0 (#142)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 8BQwen3-30B-A3B
LMArena Instruction Following13011363

Long Context Granite 4.2 8B leads

Granite 4.2 8B: 40.3 (#159), Qwen3-30B-A3B: 31.0 (#283)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 8BQwen3-30B-A3B
LMArena Longer Query13241379
Fiction.LiveBench—40.6%

Writing & Preference Qwen3-30B-A3B leads

Granite 4.2 8B: 49.6 (#189), Qwen3-30B-A3B: 55.6 (#143)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 8BQwen3-30B-A3B
LMArena Text13201384
LMArena Creative Writing12361317
LMArena Multi-Turn13011378
Short-Story Creative Writing—75.3%

Frequently asked questions

Is Granite 4.2 8B better than Qwen3-30B-A3B?

Granite 4.2 8B is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.5 to 38.9 on the Noometry Index.

Which is cheaper, Granite 4.2 8B or Qwen3-30B-A3B?

Granite 4.2 8B is cheaper. It lists at $0.06 per million input tokens and $0.25 per million output tokens; Qwen3-30B-A3B lists at $0.12 and $0.50.

Is Granite 4.2 8B or Qwen3-30B-A3B better for coding?

Granite 4.2 8B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.5 versus 37.5 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

Granite 4.2 8B does, with 131K tokens against 41K.

How many benchmarks do Granite 4.2 8B and Qwen3-30B-A3B share?

11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Granite 4.2 8B has 11 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3-30B-A3B has 32.

Related comparisons

Go deeper