Model comparison

GLM-4.5-Air vs Granite 4.2 8B

Granite 4.2 8B is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.0 to 38.7 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 11 shared benchmarks.

GLM-4.5-Air Z.ai (Zhipu)

38.7

Rank #169 Confirmed

Granite 4.2 8B IBM

40.0

Rank #143 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. GLM-4.5-Air scores higher in 4 categories and Granite 4.2 8B in 3 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where GLM-4.5-Air leads 56.1 to 49.8.
  • Granite 4.2 8B is cheaper at $0.06 / $0.25 per million input/output tokens, against $0.20 / $1.10 for GLM-4.5-Air.

Side by side

GLM-4.5-Air and Granite 4.2 8B specifications
GLM-4.5-AirGranite 4.2 8B
ProviderZ.ai (Zhipu)IBM
Noometry Index38.740.0
Released2025-07-20—
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window131K131K
Max output98K118K
Input $ / M tokens$0.20$0.06
Output $ / M tokens$1.10$0.25
Results tracked2711

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Granite 4.2 8B leads

GLM-4.5-Air: 34.5 (#225), Granite 4.2 8B: 39.9 (#138)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-4.5-AirGranite 4.2 8B
LMArena Coding13971379
GSO2.9%—

Reasoning Granite 4.2 8B leads

GLM-4.5-Air: 23.3 (#166), Granite 4.2 8B: 25.5 (#130)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-4.5-AirGranite 4.2 8B
LMArena Hard Prompts13791327
Kagi LLM Benchmark43%—
ForecastBench59.2—

Math Not comparable

GLM-4.5-Air: 33.8 (#166), Granite 4.2 8B: —

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-4.5-AirGranite 4.2 8B
Omni-MATH39.1%—
LMArena Math1396—

Knowledge Granite 4.2 8B leads

GLM-4.5-Air: 34.6 (#184), Granite 4.2 8B: 37.7 (#144)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-4.5-AirGranite 4.2 8B
LMArena Expert13701380
Humanity's Last Exam8.1%—
MMLU-Pro76.2%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate9.3%—
GPQA (HELM)59.4%—

Multilingual GLM-4.5-Air leads

GLM-4.5-Air: 49.4 (#130), Granite 4.2 8B: 44.5 (#173)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-4.5-AirGranite 4.2 8B
LMArena Non-English13661299
LMArena Chinese14271361
LMArena Russian13731283
LMArena French1399—
LMArena German1376—
LMArena Japanese1348—
LMArena Korean1306—
LMArena Spanish1385—

Instruction Following GLM-4.5-Air leads

GLM-4.5-Air: 69.8 (#165), Granite 4.2 8B: 68.7 (#183)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-4.5-AirGranite 4.2 8B
LMArena Instruction Following13531298
IFEval81.2%—

Long Context GLM-4.5-Air leads

GLM-4.5-Air: 41.6 (#130), Granite 4.2 8B: 40.2 (#154)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-4.5-AirGranite 4.2 8B
LMArena Longer Query13671323

Writing & Preference GLM-4.5-Air leads

GLM-4.5-Air: 56.1 (#134), Granite 4.2 8B: 49.8 (#183)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-4.5-AirGranite 4.2 8B
LMArena Text13841319
LMArena Creative Writing13431238
LMArena Multi-Turn13711299
WildBench78.9%—

Frequently asked questions

Is GLM-4.5-Air better than Granite 4.2 8B?

Granite 4.2 8B is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.0 to 38.7 on the Noometry Index.

Which is cheaper, GLM-4.5-Air or Granite 4.2 8B?

Granite 4.2 8B is cheaper. It lists at $0.06 per million input tokens and $0.25 per million output tokens; GLM-4.5-Air lists at $0.20 and $1.10.

Is GLM-4.5-Air or Granite 4.2 8B better for coding?

Granite 4.2 8B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 39.9 versus 34.5 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

Both accept 131K tokens.

How many benchmarks do GLM-4.5-Air and Granite 4.2 8B share?

11 benchmarks have published results for both models. GLM-4.5-Air has 27 scored results on Noometry and Granite 4.2 8B has 11.

Related comparisons

Go deeper