Model comparison

Granite 4.2 8B vs Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct

Granite 4.2 8B is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.5 to 27.9 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 11 shared benchmarks.

Granite 4.2 8B IBM

40.5

Rank #148 Confirmed

Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct Microsoft

27.9

Rank #328 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Granite 4.2 8B scores higher in 7 categories and Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Granite 4.2 8B leads 49.6 to 27.6.

Side by side

Granite 4.2 8B and Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct specifications
Granite 4.2 8BPhi 3 Mini 4k Instruct
ProviderIBMMicrosoft
Noometry Index40.527.9
Released—2024-04-23
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window131K—
Max output118K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.06—
Output $ / M tokens$0.25—
Results tracked1135

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Granite 4.2 8B leads

Granite 4.2 8B: 40.5 (#137), Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 26.6 (#323)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 8BPhi 3 Mini 4k Instruct
LMArena Coding13801093
LiveBench Coding—15.5%
HumanEval+—59.1%
MBPP+—54.2%

Reasoning Granite 4.2 8B leads

Granite 4.2 8B: 26.6 (#131), Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 14.1 (#328)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 8BPhi 3 Mini 4k Instruct
LMArena Hard Prompts13291072
Chess Puzzles—0%
LiveBench Reasoning—26.8%
LiveBench Data Analysis—34.7%
Adversarial NLI—52.8%
BIG-Bench Hard—71.7%
HellaSwag—76.7%
LiveBench—22.4%
WinoGrande—70.8%

Math Not comparable

Granite 4.2 8B: —, Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 26.6 (#257)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 8BPhi 3 Mini 4k Instruct
LiveBench Math—15.7%
LMArena Math—1111

Knowledge Granite 4.2 8B leads

Granite 4.2 8B: 38.4 (#145), Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 28.5 (#246)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 8BPhi 3 Mini 4k Instruct
LMArena Expert13841045
ARC (AI2) Challenge—84.9%
MMLU—68.8%
OpenBookQA—88%
TriviaQA—64%

Multilingual Granite 4.2 8B leads

Granite 4.2 8B: 44.5 (#178), Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 26.3 (#280)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 8BPhi 3 Mini 4k Instruct
LMArena Non-English13021021
LMArena Chinese13661021
LMArena Russian12851022
LMArena French—1076
LMArena German—1044
LMArena Japanese—935
LMArena Korean—905
LMArena Spanish—1085

Instruction Following Granite 4.2 8B leads

Granite 4.2 8B: 68.7 (#184), Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 47.7 (#303)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 8BPhi 3 Mini 4k Instruct
LMArena Instruction Following13011053
LiveBench Instruction Following—39.1%

Long Context Granite 4.2 8B leads

Granite 4.2 8B: 40.3 (#159), Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 31.7 (#276)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 8BPhi 3 Mini 4k Instruct
LMArena Longer Query13241044

Writing & Preference Granite 4.2 8B leads

Granite 4.2 8B: 49.6 (#189), Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 27.6 (#300)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 8BPhi 3 Mini 4k Instruct
LMArena Text13201073
LMArena Creative Writing12361037
LMArena Multi-Turn13011018
LiveBench Language—9.2%

Frequently asked questions

Is Granite 4.2 8B better than Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct?

Granite 4.2 8B is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.5 to 27.9 on the Noometry Index.

Is Granite 4.2 8B or Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct better for coding?

Granite 4.2 8B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.5 versus 26.6 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Granite 4.2 8B and Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct share?

11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Granite 4.2 8B has 11 scored results on Noometry and Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct has 35.

Related comparisons

Go deeper