Model comparison
Granite 4.2 3b vs Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct
Granite 4.2 3b is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.4 to 33.0 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 11 shared benchmarks.
MicrosoftSummary
- They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Granite 4.2 3b scores higher in 7 categories and Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Granite 4.2 3b leads 47.2 to 34.1.
Side by side
| Granite 4.2 3b | Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | IBM | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 39.4 | 33.0 |
| Released | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 11 | 17 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Granite 4.2 3b leads
Granite 4.2 3b: 40.0 (#151), Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 32.9 (#268)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 3b | Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1361 | 1130 |
Reasoning Granite 4.2 3b leads
Granite 4.2 3b: 26.0 (#138), Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 21.7 (#214)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 3b | Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1306 | 1127 |
Math Not comparable
Granite 4.2 3b: —, Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 33.4 (#202)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 3b | Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1173 |
Knowledge Granite 4.2 3b leads
Granite 4.2 3b: 36.3 (#171), Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 30.2 (#229)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 3b | Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1315 | 1108 |
Multilingual Granite 4.2 3b leads
Granite 4.2 3b: 42.1 (#198), Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 30.6 (#263)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 3b | Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1268 | 1094 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1269 | 1108 |
| LMArena Russian | 1249 | 1145 |
| LMArena French | — | 1110 |
| LMArena German | — | 1101 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1042 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 954 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1095 |
Instruction Following Granite 4.2 3b leads
Granite 4.2 3b: 67.1 (#200), Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 57.6 (#268)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 3b | Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1273 | 1113 |
Long Context Granite 4.2 3b leads
Granite 4.2 3b: 39.2 (#185), Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 34.0 (#255)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 3b | Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1291 | 1120 |
Writing & Preference Granite 4.2 3b leads
Granite 4.2 3b: 47.2 (#212), Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 34.1 (#272)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 3b | Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1293 | 1138 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1205 | 1107 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1290 | 1088 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Granite 4.2 3b better than Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct?
Granite 4.2 3b is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.4 to 33.0 on the Noometry Index.
Is Granite 4.2 3b or Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct better for coding?
Granite 4.2 3b scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.0 versus 32.9 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Granite 4.2 3b and Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct share?
11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Granite 4.2 3b has 11 scored results on Noometry and Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct has 17.