Model comparison

Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct vs Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct

Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.8 to 32.4 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 16 shared benchmarks.

Summary

  • They share 16 benchmarks with published results for both. Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct scores higher in 8 categories and Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct leads 50.4 to 34.3.

Side by side

Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct and Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct specifications
Olmo 3.1 32b InstructPhi 3 Medium 4k Instruct
ProviderAllen Institute for AI (Ai2)Microsoft
Noometry Index38.832.4
Released——
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked1617

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct leads

Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 38.9 (#154), Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 32.3 (#263)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkOlmo 3.1 32b InstructPhi 3 Medium 4k Instruct
LMArena Coding13461130

Reasoning Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct leads

Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 25.4 (#131), Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 20.8 (#214)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkOlmo 3.1 32b InstructPhi 3 Medium 4k Instruct
LMArena Hard Prompts13221127

Math Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct leads

Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 33.6 (#169), Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 30.9 (#202)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkOlmo 3.1 32b InstructPhi 3 Medium 4k Instruct
LMArena Math13051173

Knowledge Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct leads

Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 35.4 (#175), Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 29.6 (#226)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkOlmo 3.1 32b InstructPhi 3 Medium 4k Instruct
LMArena Expert13071108

Multilingual Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct leads

Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 42.8 (#185), Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 30.8 (#258)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkOlmo 3.1 32b InstructPhi 3 Medium 4k Instruct
LMArena Non-English12751094
LMArena Chinese13041108
LMArena French13281109
LMArena German12831101
LMArena Korean1206954
LMArena Russian12681145
LMArena Spanish13371095
LMArena Japanese—1042

Instruction Following Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct leads

Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 68.8 (#182), Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 57.8 (#263)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkOlmo 3.1 32b InstructPhi 3 Medium 4k Instruct
LMArena Instruction Following12981114

Long Context Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct leads

Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 39.9 (#161), Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 33.9 (#250)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkOlmo 3.1 32b InstructPhi 3 Medium 4k Instruct
LMArena Longer Query13121120

Writing & Preference Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct leads

Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 50.4 (#179), Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 34.3 (#267)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkOlmo 3.1 32b InstructPhi 3 Medium 4k Instruct
LMArena Text13111138
LMArena Creative Writing12641106
LMArena Multi-Turn13091088

Frequently asked questions

Is Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct better than Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct?

Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.8 to 32.4 on the Noometry Index.

Is Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct or Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct better for coding?

Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.9 versus 32.3 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct and Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct share?

16 benchmarks have published results for both models. Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct has 16 scored results on Noometry and Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct has 17.

Related comparisons

Go deeper