Model comparison

Granite 4.2 3b vs Mistral Large

Granite 4.2 3b is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.4 to 31.9 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 11 shared benchmarks.

Granite 4.2 3b IBM

39.4

Rank #169 Confirmed

Mistral Large Mistral AI

31.9

Rank #263 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Granite 4.2 3b scores higher in 6 categories and Mistral Large in 1 category; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Granite 4.2 3b leads 26.0 to 15.8.

Side by side

Granite 4.2 3b and Mistral Large specifications
Granite 4.2 3bMistral Large
ProviderIBMMistral AI
Noometry Index39.431.9
Released—2024-02-26
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window—131K
Max output—16K
Input $ / M tokens—$2
Output $ / M tokens—$6
Results tracked1151

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Granite 4.2 3b leads

Granite 4.2 3b: 40.0 (#151), Mistral Large: 34.3 (#240)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 3bMistral Large
LMArena Coding13611277
SciCode—36.2%
BigCodeBench Instruct—30%
LiveBench Coding—47.1%
BigCodeBench Complete—38.3%
ALE-Bench—264.7
HumanEval+—62.2%
MBPP+—59.5%

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Granite 4.2 3b: —, Mistral Large: 28.6 (#89)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 3bMistral Large
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard—38.4%

Reasoning Granite 4.2 3b leads

Granite 4.2 3b: 26.0 (#138), Mistral Large: 15.8 (#310)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 3bMistral Large
LMArena Hard Prompts13061257
SimpleBench—22.5%
CritPt—0%
LiveBench Reasoning—43.5%
DTBench—65.1%
LiveBench Data Analysis—50.1%
LMCA—16.7%
Epoch Capabilities Index—128.52
ForecastBench—57.1
LiveBench—48.4%

Math Not comparable

Granite 4.2 3b: —, Mistral Large: 18.2 (#291)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 3bMistral Large
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—8.5%
Omni-MATH—28.1%
LiveBench Math—42.5%
LMArena Math—1262
MATH Level 5—50.3%
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)—0.3%

Knowledge Granite 4.2 3b leads

Granite 4.2 3b: 36.3 (#171), Mistral Large: 30.1 (#230)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 3bMistral Large
LMArena Expert13151232
GPQA Diamond—51.3%
MMLU-Pro—59.9%
Confabulations—21.4%
Vectara Hallucination Rate—4.5%
GPQA (HELM)—43.5%
MMLU—80%

Multilingual Granite 4.2 3b leads

Granite 4.2 3b: 42.1 (#198), Mistral Large: 40.0 (#219)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 3bMistral Large
LMArena Non-English12681237
LMArena Chinese12691240
LMArena Russian12491257
LMArena French—1325
LMArena German—1254
LMArena Japanese—1188
LMArena Korean—1202
LMArena Spanish—1268

Instruction Following Too close to call

Granite 4.2 3b: 67.1 (#200), Mistral Large: 67.9 (#191)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 3bMistral Large
LMArena Instruction Following12731249
LiveBench Instruction Following—67.9%
IFEval—87.7%

Long Context Too close to call

Granite 4.2 3b: 39.2 (#185), Mistral Large: 38.3 (#199)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 3bMistral Large
LMArena Longer Query12911261

Writing & Preference Granite 4.2 3b leads

Granite 4.2 3b: 47.2 (#212), Mistral Large: 40.7 (#242)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 3bMistral Large
LMArena Text12931266
LMArena Creative Writing12051243
LMArena Multi-Turn12901260
Short-Story Creative Writing—69%
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—985
WildBench—80.1%
LiveBench Language—39.4%

Frequently asked questions

Is Granite 4.2 3b better than Mistral Large?

Granite 4.2 3b is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.4 to 31.9 on the Noometry Index.

Is Granite 4.2 3b or Mistral Large better for coding?

Granite 4.2 3b scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.0 versus 34.3 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Granite 4.2 3b and Mistral Large share?

11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Granite 4.2 3b has 11 scored results on Noometry and Mistral Large has 51.

Related comparisons

Go deeper