Model comparison

Gemma 3 12B vs Granite 4.2 3b

Granite 4.2 3b is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.0 to 31.8 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 10 shared benchmarks.

Gemma 3 12B Google

31.8

Rank #255 Confirmed

Granite 4.2 3b IBM

39.0

Rank #163 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 3 12B scores higher in 3 categories and Granite 4.2 3b in 4 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Granite 4.2 3b leads 25.0 to 15.2.

Side by side

Gemma 3 12B and Granite 4.2 3b specifications
Gemma 3 12BGranite 4.2 3b
ProviderGoogleIBM
Noometry Index31.839.0
Released2025-03-12—
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window131K—
Max output8K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.05—
Output $ / M tokens$0.15—
Results tracked2411

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Granite 4.2 3b leads

Gemma 3 12B: 31.2 (#276), Granite 4.2 3b: 39.4 (#146)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 12BGranite 4.2 3b
LMArena Coding12811363
SciCode17.4%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Gemma 3 12B: 25.3 (#101), Granite 4.2 3b: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 12BGranite 4.2 3b
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard30.4%—

Reasoning Granite 4.2 3b leads

Gemma 3 12B: 15.2 (#307), Granite 4.2 3b: 25.0 (#136)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 12BGranite 4.2 3b
LMArena Hard Prompts13091308
CritPt0%—
Chess Puzzles0%—
DTBench48.8%—
LMCA4.5%—
Epoch Capabilities Index123.49—

Math Not comparable

Gemma 3 12B: 21.0 (#273), Granite 4.2 3b: —

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 12BGranite 4.2 3b
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202516.7%—
LMArena Math1307—

Knowledge Granite 4.2 3b leads

Gemma 3 12B: 26.5 (#250), Granite 4.2 3b: 35.6 (#169)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 12BGranite 4.2 3b
LMArena Expert12481313
GPQA Diamond39.5%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate4.4%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Gemma 3 12B: —, Granite 4.2 3b: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 12BGranite 4.2 3b
MindCube46.7%—

Multilingual Gemma 3 12B leads

Gemma 3 12B: 45.9 (#160), Granite 4.2 3b: 42.4 (#193)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 12BGranite 4.2 3b
LMArena Non-English13181268
LMArena Russian13351249
LMArena Chinese—1268
LMArena German1370—

Instruction Following Gemma 3 12B leads

Gemma 3 12B: 68.8 (#179), Granite 4.2 3b: 67.2 (#195)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 12BGranite 4.2 3b
LMArena Instruction Following12991271

Long Context Too close to call

Gemma 3 12B: 40.0 (#157), Granite 4.2 3b: 39.3 (#179)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 12BGranite 4.2 3b
LMArena Longer Query13171293

Writing & Preference Too close to call

Gemma 3 12B: 47.7 (#205), Granite 4.2 3b: 47.9 (#202)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 12BGranite 4.2 3b
LMArena Text13341295
LMArena Creative Writing13311215
LMArena Multi-Turn13341293
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1126—

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemma 3 12B better than Granite 4.2 3b?

Granite 4.2 3b is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.0 to 31.8 on the Noometry Index.

Is Gemma 3 12B or Granite 4.2 3b better for coding?

Granite 4.2 3b scores higher on coding benchmarks: 39.4 versus 31.2 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Gemma 3 12B and Granite 4.2 3b share?

10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 3 12B has 24 scored results on Noometry and Granite 4.2 3b has 11.

Related comparisons

Go deeper