Model comparison

Granite 4.2 3b vs Llama 4 Scout

Granite 4.2 3b is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.0 to 27.4 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 11 shared benchmarks.

Granite 4.2 3b IBM

39.0

Rank #163 Confirmed

Llama 4 Scout Meta

27.4

Rank #323 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Granite 4.2 3b scores higher in 7 categories and Llama 4 Scout in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in coding, where Granite 4.2 3b leads 39.4 to 19.9.

Side by side

Granite 4.2 3b and Llama 4 Scout specifications
Granite 4.2 3bLlama 4 Scout
ProviderIBMMeta
Noometry Index39.027.4
Released—2025-04-05
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window—128K
Max output—4K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.10
Output $ / M tokens—$0.30
Results tracked1143

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Granite 4.2 3b leads

Granite 4.2 3b: 39.4 (#146), Llama 4 Scout: 19.9 (#334)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 3bLlama 4 Scout
LMArena Coding13631286
SWE-bench Verified (bash only)—9.1%
SciCode—17%
BigCodeBench Complete—43.1%

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Granite 4.2 3b: —, Llama 4 Scout: 24.4 (#109)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 3bLlama 4 Scout
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard—28.1%

Reasoning Granite 4.2 3b leads

Granite 4.2 3b: 25.0 (#136), Llama 4 Scout: 9.2 (#339)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 3bLlama 4 Scout
LMArena Hard Prompts13081266
ARC-AGI-2—0%
Kagi LLM Benchmark—36.9%
ARC-AGI-1—0.5%
CritPt—0%
DTBench—57.9%
LMCA—12%
Epoch Capabilities Index—129.64
ForecastBench—57.5

Math Not comparable

Granite 4.2 3b: —, Llama 4 Scout: 18.4 (#280)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 3bLlama 4 Scout
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—7.8%
Omni-MATH—37.3%
LMArena Math—1286
MATH Level 5—62.3%
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)—0%

Knowledge Granite 4.2 3b leads

Granite 4.2 3b: 35.6 (#169), Llama 4 Scout: 31.8 (#208)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 3bLlama 4 Scout
LMArena Expert13131236
GPQA Diamond—51.8%
MMLU-Pro—74.2%
Vectara Hallucination Rate—7.7%
GPQA (HELM)—50.7%

Multimodal Not comparable

Granite 4.2 3b: —, Llama 4 Scout: 31.6 (#98)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 3bLlama 4 Scout
LMArena Vision—1118
SpatialViz-Bench—34.2%

Multilingual Granite 4.2 3b leads

Granite 4.2 3b: 42.4 (#193), Llama 4 Scout: 41.3 (#207)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 3bLlama 4 Scout
LMArena Non-English12681253
LMArena Chinese12681256
LMArena Russian12491263
LMArena French—1283
LMArena German—1274
LMArena Japanese—1209
LMArena Korean—1207
LMArena Spanish—1277

Instruction Following Granite 4.2 3b leads

Granite 4.2 3b: 67.2 (#195), Llama 4 Scout: 66.0 (#212)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 3bLlama 4 Scout
LMArena Instruction Following12711248
IFEval—81.8%

Long Context Granite 4.2 3b leads

Granite 4.2 3b: 39.3 (#179), Llama 4 Scout: 27.5 (#289)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 3bLlama 4 Scout
LMArena Longer Query12931265
Fiction.LiveBench—36%

Writing & Preference Granite 4.2 3b leads

Granite 4.2 3b: 47.9 (#202), Llama 4 Scout: 37.1 (#256)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 3bLlama 4 Scout
LMArena Text12951279
LMArena Creative Writing12151249
LMArena Multi-Turn12931281
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—783
WildBench—78%

Frequently asked questions

Is Granite 4.2 3b better than Llama 4 Scout?

Granite 4.2 3b is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.0 to 27.4 on the Noometry Index.

Is Granite 4.2 3b or Llama 4 Scout better for coding?

Granite 4.2 3b scores higher on coding benchmarks: 39.4 versus 19.9 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Granite 4.2 3b and Llama 4 Scout share?

11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Granite 4.2 3b has 11 scored results on Noometry and Llama 4 Scout has 43.

Related comparisons

Go deeper