Model comparison

Granite 4.2 3b vs Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct

Granite 4.2 3b is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.4 to 30.6 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 11 shared benchmarks.

Granite 4.2 3b IBM

39.4

Rank #169 Confirmed

Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct Meta

30.6

Rank #291 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Granite 4.2 3b scores higher in 5 categories and Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct in 2 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in long context, where Granite 4.2 3b leads 39.2 to 26.4.

Side by side

Granite 4.2 3b and Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct specifications
Granite 4.2 3bLlama-3.3-70B-Instruct
ProviderIBMMeta
Noometry Index39.430.6
Released—2024-12-06
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window—128K
Max output—4K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.10
Output $ / M tokens—$0.32
Results tracked1143

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Granite 4.2 3b leads

Granite 4.2 3b: 40.0 (#151), Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct: 31.0 (#290)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 3bLlama-3.3-70B-Instruct
LMArena Coding13611268
SciCode—26%
WeirdML—14.4%
BigCodeBench Instruct—46.9%
LiveBench Coding—36.6%
BigCodeBench Complete—57.5%

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Granite 4.2 3b: —, Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct: 25.8 (#105)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 3bLlama-3.3-70B-Instruct
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard—31.9%
BALROG—23%

Reasoning Granite 4.2 3b leads

Granite 4.2 3b: 26.0 (#138), Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct: 14.1 (#327)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 3bLlama-3.3-70B-Instruct
LMArena Hard Prompts13061257
SimpleBench—19.9%
CritPt—0%
LiveBench Reasoning—50.8%
DTBench—59.5%
LiveBench Data Analysis—49.5%
LMCA—17.5%
Epoch Capabilities Index—127.33
ForecastBench—58.6
LiveBench—50.2%

Math Not comparable

Granite 4.2 3b: —, Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct: 15.3 (#298)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 3bLlama-3.3-70B-Instruct
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—5.1%
LiveBench Math—42.2%
LMArena Math—1267
MATH Level 5—41.6%

Knowledge Granite 4.2 3b leads

Granite 4.2 3b: 36.3 (#171), Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct: 30.6 (#226)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 3bLlama-3.3-70B-Instruct
LMArena Expert13151225
GPQA Diamond—47.4%
Confabulations—22.8%
Vectara Hallucination Rate—4.1%
MMLU—86.3%

Multilingual Granite 4.2 3b leads

Granite 4.2 3b: 42.1 (#198), Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct: 39.9 (#220)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 3bLlama-3.3-70B-Instruct
LMArena Non-English12681236
LMArena Chinese12691217
LMArena Russian12491252
LMArena French—1281
LMArena German—1251
LMArena Japanese—1150
LMArena Korean—1143
LMArena Spanish—1270

Instruction Following Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct leads

Granite 4.2 3b: 67.1 (#200), Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct: 71.1 (#157)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 3bLlama-3.3-70B-Instruct
LMArena Instruction Following12731242
LiveBench Instruction Following—82.7%

Long Context Granite 4.2 3b leads

Granite 4.2 3b: 39.2 (#185), Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct: 26.4 (#295)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 3bLlama-3.3-70B-Instruct
LMArena Longer Query12911256
Fiction.LiveBench—33.3%

Writing & Preference Too close to call

Granite 4.2 3b: 47.2 (#212), Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct: 47.6 (#207)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 3bLlama-3.3-70B-Instruct
LMArena Text12931274
LMArena Creative Writing12051250
LMArena Multi-Turn12901280
LiveBench Language—39.2%

Frequently asked questions

Is Granite 4.2 3b better than Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct?

Granite 4.2 3b is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.4 to 30.6 on the Noometry Index.

Is Granite 4.2 3b or Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct better for coding?

Granite 4.2 3b scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.0 versus 31.0 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Granite 4.2 3b and Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct share?

11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Granite 4.2 3b has 11 scored results on Noometry and Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct has 43.

Related comparisons

Go deeper