Model comparison
Granite 4.2 30b vs Qwen1.5-110B
Granite 4.2 30b is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.4 to 33.6 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 11 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Granite 4.2 30b scores higher in 7 categories and Qwen1.5-110B in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Granite 4.2 30b leads 54.3 to 38.1.
Side by side
| Granite 4.2 30b | Qwen1.5-110B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | IBM | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 41.4 | 33.6 |
| Released | — | 2024-04-25 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 11 | 20 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Granite 4.2 30b leads
Granite 4.2 30b: 40.4 (#127), Qwen1.5-110B: 32.4 (#260)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 30b | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1394 | 1184 |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 35% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 44.4% |
Reasoning Granite 4.2 30b leads
Granite 4.2 30b: 26.7 (#114), Qwen1.5-110B: 21.7 (#192)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 30b | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1375 | 1168 |
| ForecastBench | — | 57.7 |
Math Not comparable
Granite 4.2 30b: —, Qwen1.5-110B: 31.1 (#199)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 30b | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1185 |
Knowledge Granite 4.2 30b leads
Granite 4.2 30b: 38.5 (#134), Qwen1.5-110B: 30.7 (#217)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 30b | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1405 | 1144 |
Multilingual Granite 4.2 30b leads
Granite 4.2 30b: 47.4 (#146), Qwen1.5-110B: 33.8 (#245)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 30b | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1340 | 1142 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1415 | 1206 |
| LMArena Russian | 1342 | 1118 |
| LMArena French | — | 1150 |
| LMArena German | — | 1123 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1074 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1044 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1141 |
Instruction Following Granite 4.2 30b leads
Granite 4.2 30b: 71.3 (#150), Qwen1.5-110B: 60.6 (#247)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 30b | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1346 | 1158 |
Long Context Granite 4.2 30b leads
Granite 4.2 30b: 41.4 (#135), Qwen1.5-110B: 35.0 (#237)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 30b | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1359 | 1157 |
Writing & Preference Granite 4.2 30b leads
Granite 4.2 30b: 54.3 (#147), Qwen1.5-110B: 38.1 (#250)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 30b | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1363 | 1175 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1294 | 1148 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1340 | 1160 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Granite 4.2 30b better than Qwen1.5-110B?
Granite 4.2 30b is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.4 to 33.6 on the Noometry Index.
Is Granite 4.2 30b or Qwen1.5-110B better for coding?
Granite 4.2 30b scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.4 versus 32.4 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Granite 4.2 30b and Qwen1.5-110B share?
11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Granite 4.2 30b has 11 scored results on Noometry and Qwen1.5-110B has 20.