Model comparison

Granite 4.2 30b vs Mistral Large

Granite 4.2 30b is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.8 to 31.9 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 11 shared benchmarks.

Granite 4.2 30b IBM

41.8

Rank #130 Confirmed

Mistral Large Mistral AI

31.9

Rank #263 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Granite 4.2 30b scores higher in 7 categories and Mistral Large in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Granite 4.2 30b leads 53.8 to 40.7.

Side by side

Granite 4.2 30b and Mistral Large specifications
Granite 4.2 30bMistral Large
ProviderIBMMistral AI
Noometry Index41.831.9
Released—2024-02-26
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window—131K
Max output—16K
Input $ / M tokens—$2
Output $ / M tokens—$6
Results tracked1151

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Granite 4.2 30b leads

Granite 4.2 30b: 41.0 (#126), Mistral Large: 34.3 (#240)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 30bMistral Large
LMArena Coding13961277
SciCode—36.2%
BigCodeBench Instruct—30%
LiveBench Coding—47.1%
BigCodeBench Complete—38.3%
ALE-Bench—264.7
HumanEval+—62.2%
MBPP+—59.5%

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Granite 4.2 30b: —, Mistral Large: 28.6 (#89)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 30bMistral Large
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard—38.4%

Reasoning Granite 4.2 30b leads

Granite 4.2 30b: 27.8 (#112), Mistral Large: 15.8 (#310)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 30bMistral Large
LMArena Hard Prompts13741257
SimpleBench—22.5%
CritPt—0%
LiveBench Reasoning—43.5%
DTBench—65.1%
LiveBench Data Analysis—50.1%
LMCA—16.7%
Epoch Capabilities Index—128.52
ForecastBench—57.1
LiveBench—48.4%

Math Not comparable

Granite 4.2 30b: —, Mistral Large: 18.2 (#291)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 30bMistral Large
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—8.5%
Omni-MATH—28.1%
LiveBench Math—42.5%
LMArena Math—1262
MATH Level 5—50.3%
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)—0.3%

Knowledge Granite 4.2 30b leads

Granite 4.2 30b: 39.1 (#138), Mistral Large: 30.1 (#230)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 30bMistral Large
LMArena Expert14061232
GPQA Diamond—51.3%
MMLU-Pro—59.9%
Confabulations—21.4%
Vectara Hallucination Rate—4.5%
GPQA (HELM)—43.5%
MMLU—80%

Multilingual Granite 4.2 30b leads

Granite 4.2 30b: 47.3 (#151), Mistral Large: 40.0 (#219)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 30bMistral Large
LMArena Non-English13401237
LMArena Chinese14141240
LMArena Russian13431257
LMArena French—1325
LMArena German—1254
LMArena Japanese—1188
LMArena Korean—1202
LMArena Spanish—1268

Instruction Following Granite 4.2 30b leads

Granite 4.2 30b: 71.2 (#155), Mistral Large: 67.9 (#191)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 30bMistral Large
LMArena Instruction Following13471249
LiveBench Instruction Following—67.9%
IFEval—87.7%

Long Context Granite 4.2 30b leads

Granite 4.2 30b: 41.4 (#140), Mistral Large: 38.3 (#199)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 30bMistral Large
LMArena Longer Query13591261

Writing & Preference Granite 4.2 30b leads

Granite 4.2 30b: 53.8 (#156), Mistral Large: 40.7 (#242)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 30bMistral Large
LMArena Text13611266
LMArena Creative Writing12881243
LMArena Multi-Turn13391260
Short-Story Creative Writing—69%
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—985
WildBench—80.1%
LiveBench Language—39.4%

Frequently asked questions

Is Granite 4.2 30b better than Mistral Large?

Granite 4.2 30b is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.8 to 31.9 on the Noometry Index.

Is Granite 4.2 30b or Mistral Large better for coding?

Granite 4.2 30b scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.0 versus 34.3 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Granite 4.2 30b and Mistral Large share?

11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Granite 4.2 30b has 11 scored results on Noometry and Mistral Large has 51.

Related comparisons

Go deeper