Model comparison

Gemma 3 12B vs Granite 4.2 30b

Granite 4.2 30b is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.8 to 32.1 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 10 shared benchmarks.

Gemma 3 12B Google

32.1

Rank #262 Confirmed

Granite 4.2 30b IBM

41.8

Rank #130 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 3 12B scores higher in 0 categories and Granite 4.2 30b in 7 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Granite 4.2 30b leads 39.1 to 26.5.

Side by side

Gemma 3 12B and Granite 4.2 30b specifications
Gemma 3 12BGranite 4.2 30b
ProviderGoogleIBM
Noometry Index32.141.8
Released2025-03-12—
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window131K—
Max output8K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.05—
Output $ / M tokens$0.15—
Results tracked2411

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Granite 4.2 30b leads

Gemma 3 12B: 31.7 (#280), Granite 4.2 30b: 41.0 (#126)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 12BGranite 4.2 30b
LMArena Coding12811396
SciCode17.4%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Gemma 3 12B: 25.5 (#108), Granite 4.2 30b: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 12BGranite 4.2 30b
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard30.4%—

Reasoning Granite 4.2 30b leads

Gemma 3 12B: 15.7 (#313), Granite 4.2 30b: 27.8 (#112)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 12BGranite 4.2 30b
LMArena Hard Prompts13091374
CritPt0%—
Chess Puzzles0%—
DTBench48.8%—
LMCA4.5%—
Epoch Capabilities Index123.5—

Math Not comparable

Gemma 3 12B: 22.3 (#279), Granite 4.2 30b: —

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 12BGranite 4.2 30b
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202516.7%—
LMArena Math1307—

Knowledge Granite 4.2 30b leads

Gemma 3 12B: 26.5 (#257), Granite 4.2 30b: 39.1 (#138)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 12BGranite 4.2 30b
LMArena Expert12481406
GPQA Diamond39.5%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate4.4%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Gemma 3 12B: —, Granite 4.2 30b: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 12BGranite 4.2 30b
MindCube46.7%—

Multilingual Granite 4.2 30b leads

Gemma 3 12B: 45.7 (#165), Granite 4.2 30b: 47.3 (#151)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 12BGranite 4.2 30b
LMArena Non-English13181340
LMArena Russian13351343
LMArena Chinese—1414
LMArena German1370—

Instruction Following Granite 4.2 30b leads

Gemma 3 12B: 68.6 (#186), Granite 4.2 30b: 71.2 (#155)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 12BGranite 4.2 30b
LMArena Instruction Following12991347

Long Context Granite 4.2 30b leads

Gemma 3 12B: 40.0 (#162), Granite 4.2 30b: 41.4 (#140)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 12BGranite 4.2 30b
LMArena Longer Query13171359

Writing & Preference Granite 4.2 30b leads

Gemma 3 12B: 47.5 (#209), Granite 4.2 30b: 53.8 (#156)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 12BGranite 4.2 30b
LMArena Text13341361
LMArena Creative Writing13311288
LMArena Multi-Turn13341339
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1126—

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemma 3 12B better than Granite 4.2 30b?

Granite 4.2 30b is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.8 to 32.1 on the Noometry Index.

Is Gemma 3 12B or Granite 4.2 30b better for coding?

Granite 4.2 30b scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.0 versus 31.7 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Gemma 3 12B and Granite 4.2 30b share?

10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 3 12B has 24 scored results on Noometry and Granite 4.2 30b has 11.

Related comparisons

Go deeper