Model comparison

Granite 4.2 30b vs Llama 3-8B

Granite 4.2 30b is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.8 to 25.5 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 11 shared benchmarks.

Granite 4.2 30b IBM

41.8

Rank #130 Confirmed

Llama 3-8B Meta

25.5

Rank #344 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Granite 4.2 30b scores higher in 7 categories and Llama 3-8B in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Granite 4.2 30b leads 39.1 to 7.8.

Side by side

Granite 4.2 30b and Llama 3-8B specifications
Granite 4.2 30bLlama 3-8B
ProviderIBMMeta
Noometry Index41.825.5
Released—2024-04-18
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked1134

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Granite 4.2 30b leads

Granite 4.2 30b: 41.0 (#126), Llama 3-8B: 31.0 (#289)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 30bLlama 3-8B
LMArena Coding13961152
BigCodeBench Instruct—31.9%
BigCodeBench Complete—36.9%
HumanEval+—56.7%
MBPP+—54.8%

Reasoning Granite 4.2 30b leads

Granite 4.2 30b: 27.8 (#112), Llama 3-8B: 14.3 (#326)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 30bLlama 3-8B
LMArena Hard Prompts13741133
Chess Puzzles—0%
DTBench—43.9%
Adversarial NLI—57.3%
Epoch Capabilities Index—116.45
ForecastBench—58.6
WinoGrande—75.7%

Math Not comparable

Granite 4.2 30b: —, Llama 3-8B: 8.8 (#323)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 30bLlama 3-8B
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—1.9%
LMArena Math—1151
MATH Level 5—6.1%

Knowledge Granite 4.2 30b leads

Granite 4.2 30b: 39.1 (#138), Llama 3-8B: 7.8 (#308)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 30bLlama 3-8B
LMArena Expert14061113
GPQA Diamond—26.1%
ARC (AI2) Challenge—82.8%
MMLU—68.8%
OpenBookQA—82.6%
TriviaQA—67.7%

Multilingual Granite 4.2 30b leads

Granite 4.2 30b: 47.3 (#151), Llama 3-8B: 30.8 (#261)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 30bLlama 3-8B
LMArena Non-English13401098
LMArena Chinese14141076
LMArena Russian13431109
LMArena French—1159
LMArena German—1104
LMArena Japanese—967
LMArena Korean—1004
LMArena Spanish—1173

Instruction Following Granite 4.2 30b leads

Granite 4.2 30b: 71.2 (#155), Llama 3-8B: 58.4 (#260)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 30bLlama 3-8B
LMArena Instruction Following13471127

Long Context Granite 4.2 30b leads

Granite 4.2 30b: 41.4 (#140), Llama 3-8B: 34.2 (#251)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 30bLlama 3-8B
LMArena Longer Query13591128

Writing & Preference Granite 4.2 30b leads

Granite 4.2 30b: 53.8 (#156), Llama 3-8B: 37.5 (#256)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 30bLlama 3-8B
LMArena Text13611166
LMArena Creative Writing12881150
LMArena Multi-Turn13391152

Frequently asked questions

Is Granite 4.2 30b better than Llama 3-8B?

Granite 4.2 30b is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.8 to 25.5 on the Noometry Index.

Is Granite 4.2 30b or Llama 3-8B better for coding?

Granite 4.2 30b scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.0 versus 31.0 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Granite 4.2 30b and Llama 3-8B share?

11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Granite 4.2 30b has 11 scored results on Noometry and Llama 3-8B has 34.

Related comparisons

Go deeper