Model comparison

Granite 4.1 8b vs Qwen3 Max

Qwen3 Max is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.7 to 37.4 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

Granite 4.1 8b IBM

37.4

Rank #205 Confirmed

Qwen3 Max Alibaba (Qwen)

43.7

Rank #87 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Granite 4.1 8b scores higher in 1 category and Qwen3 Max in 7 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Qwen3 Max leads 62.4 to 48.1.
  • Granite 4.1 8b has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Granite 4.1 8b and Qwen3 Max specifications
Granite 4.1 8bQwen3 Max
ProviderIBMAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index37.443.7
Released—2025-09-23
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window—262K
Max output—66K
Input $ / M tokens—$1.20
Output $ / M tokens—$6
Results tracked1333

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Qwen3 Max leads

Granite 4.1 8b: 30.1 (#297), Qwen3 Max: 43.0 (#93)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.1 8bQwen3 Max
LMArena Coding13121456
LMArena WebDev1192—
ALE-Bench—370.45

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Granite 4.1 8b: —, Qwen3 Max: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.1 8bQwen3 Max
Vending-Bench 2—71.56

Reasoning Granite 4.1 8b leads

Granite 4.1 8b: 25.7 (#143), Qwen3 Max: 22.6 (#190)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.1 8bQwen3 Max
LMArena Hard Prompts12931448
Kagi LLM Benchmark—72.5%
NYT Connections (extended)—30.1%
Chess Puzzles—4%
Mystery Game Puzzles—5%
DTBench—82.1%
LMCA—28.3%
Epoch Capabilities Index—142.38

Math Qwen3 Max leads

Granite 4.1 8b: 36.4 (#166), Qwen3 Max: 38.7 (#131)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.1 8bQwen3 Max
LMArena Math13121446
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—18.9%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—73.3%
MATH Level 5—97.1%

Knowledge Qwen3 Max leads

Granite 4.1 8b: 36.1 (#174), Qwen3 Max: 48.1 (#78)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.1 8bQwen3 Max
LMArena Expert13091455
GPQA Diamond—72.6%
SimpleQA Verified—48.7%

Multilingual Qwen3 Max leads

Granite 4.1 8b: 41.7 (#204), Qwen3 Max: 53.7 (#62)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.1 8bQwen3 Max
LMArena Non-English12611429
LMArena Chinese13371478
LMArena Russian12401428
LMArena French—1449
LMArena German—1463
LMArena Japanese—1397
LMArena Korean—1399
LMArena Spanish—1462

Instruction Following Qwen3 Max leads

Granite 4.1 8b: 66.9 (#203), Qwen3 Max: 74.8 (#87)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.1 8bQwen3 Max
LMArena Instruction Following12691419

Long Context Qwen3 Max leads

Granite 4.1 8b: 38.7 (#193), Qwen3 Max: 41.6 (#134)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.1 8bQwen3 Max
LMArena Longer Query12751438
Fiction.LiveBench—66.7%
CL-bench—14.5%

Writing & Preference Qwen3 Max leads

Granite 4.1 8b: 48.1 (#204), Qwen3 Max: 62.4 (#76)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.1 8bQwen3 Max
LMArena Text12901439
LMArena Creative Writing12511402
LMArena Multi-Turn12681446

Frequently asked questions

Is Granite 4.1 8b better than Qwen3 Max?

Qwen3 Max is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.7 to 37.4 on the Noometry Index.

Is Granite 4.1 8b or Qwen3 Max better for coding?

Qwen3 Max scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.0 versus 30.1 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Granite 4.1 8b and Qwen3 Max share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Granite 4.1 8b has 13 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3 Max has 33.

Related comparisons

Go deeper