Model comparison
Granite 4.1 8b vs Grok 4.7
Grok 4.7 is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.6 to 36.8 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 13 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Granite 4.1 8b scores higher in 0 categories and Grok 4.7 in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in coding, where Grok 4.7 leads 55.0 to 29.9.
- Granite 4.1 8b has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Granite 4.1 8b | Grok 4.7 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | IBM | xAI |
| Noometry Index | 36.8 | 46.6 |
| Released | — | 2026-09-21 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 500K |
| Max output | — | 500K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $2 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $6 |
| Results tracked | 13 | 21 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Grok 4.7 leads
Granite 4.1 8b: 29.9 (#291), Grok 4.7: 55.0 (#23)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.1 8b | Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1190 | 1636 |
| LMArena Coding | 1313 | 1423 |
| CursorBench | — | 46.3% |
| FrontierSWE | — | 29.5% |
| SciCode | — | 57.4% |
Reasoning Grok 4.7 leads
Granite 4.1 8b: 24.6 (#142), Grok 4.7: 40.1 (#49)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.1 8b | Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1294 | 1409 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 76.8% |
| CritPt | — | 17.7% |
Math Grok 4.7 leads
Granite 4.1 8b: 33.8 (#167), Grok 4.7: 41.1 (#73)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.1 8b | Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1311 | 1393 |
| ProofBench | — | 34% |
Knowledge Grok 4.7 leads
Granite 4.1 8b: 35.5 (#171), Grok 4.7: 38.7 (#130)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.1 8b | Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1310 | 1413 |
Multimodal Not comparable
Granite 4.1 8b: —, Grok 4.7: 28.8 (#107)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.1 8b | Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| Furniture Assembly | — | 20.8% |
Multilingual Grok 4.7 leads
Granite 4.1 8b: 41.8 (#199), Grok 4.7: 51.2 (#108)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.1 8b | Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1261 | 1392 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1335 | 1476 |
| LMArena Russian | 1238 | 1396 |
Instruction Following Grok 4.7 leads
Granite 4.1 8b: 67.0 (#198), Grok 4.7: 74.3 (#98)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.1 8b | Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1268 | 1406 |
Long Context Grok 4.7 leads
Granite 4.1 8b: 38.7 (#188), Grok 4.7: 43.2 (#97)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.1 8b | Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1275 | 1416 |
Writing & Preference Grok 4.7 leads
Granite 4.1 8b: 48.3 (#199), Grok 4.7: 70.1 (#23)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.1 8b | Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1291 | 1397 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1249 | 1391 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1269 | 1389 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 2007 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Granite 4.1 8b better than Grok 4.7?
Grok 4.7 is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.6 to 36.8 on the Noometry Index.
Is Granite 4.1 8b or Grok 4.7 better for coding?
Grok 4.7 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 55.0 versus 29.9 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Granite 4.1 8b and Grok 4.7 share?
13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Granite 4.1 8b has 13 scored results on Noometry and Grok 4.7 has 21.