Model comparison

Granite 4.1 8b vs Grok 4.1 Fast

Grok 4.1 Fast is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.4 to 37.4 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 13 shared benchmarks.

Granite 4.1 8b IBM

37.4

Rank #205 Confirmed

Grok 4.1 Fast xAI

41.4

Rank #136 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Granite 4.1 8b scores higher in 2 categories and Grok 4.1 Fast in 6 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Grok 4.1 Fast leads 43.4 to 25.7.
  • Granite 4.1 8b has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Granite 4.1 8b and Grok 4.1 Fast specifications
Granite 4.1 8bGrok 4.1 Fast
ProviderIBMxAI
Noometry Index37.441.4
Released—2025-06-27
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window—128K
Max output—30K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.20
Output $ / M tokens—$0.50
Results tracked1332

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Grok 4.1 Fast leads

Granite 4.1 8b: 30.1 (#297), Grok 4.1 Fast: 34.1 (#245)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.1 8bGrok 4.1 Fast
LMArena WebDev11921242
LMArena Coding13121411
ALE-Bench—394.93

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Granite 4.1 8b: —, Grok 4.1 Fast: 36.3 (#39)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.1 8bGrok 4.1 Fast
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard—69.6%
τ²-bench Banking—13.1%
LMArena Search—1171
Vending-Bench 2—1,107

Reasoning Grok 4.1 Fast leads

Granite 4.1 8b: 25.7 (#143), Grok 4.1 Fast: 43.4 (#49)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.1 8bGrok 4.1 Fast
LMArena Hard Prompts12931407
SimpleBench—56%
NYT Connections (extended)—87.4%
DTBench—87.7%
ForecastBench—61

Math Granite 4.1 8b leads

Granite 4.1 8b: 36.4 (#166), Grok 4.1 Fast: 31.9 (#221)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.1 8bGrok 4.1 Fast
LMArena Math13121408
MathArena Final-Answer Competitions—60.9%
ProofBench—4%

Knowledge Granite 4.1 8b leads

Granite 4.1 8b: 36.1 (#174), Grok 4.1 Fast: 33.1 (#207)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.1 8bGrok 4.1 Fast
LMArena Expert13091399
Vectara Hallucination Rate—17.8%

Multimodal Not comparable

Granite 4.1 8b: —, Grok 4.1 Fast: 37.0 (#76)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.1 8bGrok 4.1 Fast
LMArena Vision—1201

Multilingual Grok 4.1 Fast leads

Granite 4.1 8b: 41.7 (#204), Grok 4.1 Fast: 51.0 (#114)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.1 8bGrok 4.1 Fast
LMArena Non-English12611391
LMArena Chinese13371441
LMArena Russian12401387
LMArena French—1415
LMArena German—1404
LMArena Japanese—1349
LMArena Korean—1361
LMArena Spanish—1413

Instruction Following Grok 4.1 Fast leads

Granite 4.1 8b: 66.9 (#203), Grok 4.1 Fast: 72.7 (#133)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.1 8bGrok 4.1 Fast
LMArena Instruction Following12691376

Long Context Grok 4.1 Fast leads

Granite 4.1 8b: 38.7 (#193), Grok 4.1 Fast: 42.4 (#126)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.1 8bGrok 4.1 Fast
LMArena Longer Query12751390

Writing & Preference Grok 4.1 Fast leads

Granite 4.1 8b: 48.1 (#204), Grok 4.1 Fast: 57.2 (#131)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.1 8bGrok 4.1 Fast
LMArena Text12901408
LMArena Creative Writing12511394
LMArena Multi-Turn12681389
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—1327

Frequently asked questions

Is Granite 4.1 8b better than Grok 4.1 Fast?

Grok 4.1 Fast is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.4 to 37.4 on the Noometry Index.

Is Granite 4.1 8b or Grok 4.1 Fast better for coding?

Grok 4.1 Fast scores higher on coding benchmarks: 34.1 versus 30.1 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Granite 4.1 8b and Grok 4.1 Fast share?

13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Granite 4.1 8b has 13 scored results on Noometry and Grok 4.1 Fast has 32.

Related comparisons

Go deeper