Model comparison
GLM-4.6V vs Granite 4.1 8b
GLM-4.6V is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.9 to 36.8 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 11 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. GLM-4.6V scores higher in 7 categories and Granite 4.1 8b in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in coding, where GLM-4.6V leads 40.2 to 29.9.
Side by side
| GLM-4.6V | Granite 4.1 8b | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Z.ai (Zhipu) | IBM |
| Noometry Index | 40.9 | 36.8 |
| Released | 2025-12-08 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 128K | — |
| Max output | 33K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.30 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.90 | — |
| Results tracked | 12 | 13 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding GLM-4.6V leads
GLM-4.6V: 40.2 (#128), Granite 4.1 8b: 29.9 (#291)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | Granite 4.1 8b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1390 | 1313 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1190 |
Reasoning GLM-4.6V leads
GLM-4.6V: 26.5 (#117), Granite 4.1 8b: 24.6 (#142)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | Granite 4.1 8b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1368 | 1294 |
Math Not comparable
GLM-4.6V: —, Granite 4.1 8b: 33.8 (#167)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | Granite 4.1 8b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1311 |
Knowledge GLM-4.6V leads
GLM-4.6V: 37.4 (#148), Granite 4.1 8b: 35.5 (#171)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | Granite 4.1 8b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1372 | 1310 |
Multimodal Not comparable
GLM-4.6V: 34.2 (#83), Granite 4.1 8b: —
| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | Granite 4.1 8b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1164 | — |
Multilingual GLM-4.6V leads
GLM-4.6V: 48.8 (#135), Granite 4.1 8b: 41.8 (#199)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | Granite 4.1 8b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1359 | 1261 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1426 | 1335 |
| LMArena Russian | 1341 | 1238 |
Instruction Following GLM-4.6V leads
GLM-4.6V: 71.6 (#145), Granite 4.1 8b: 67.0 (#198)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | Granite 4.1 8b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1351 | 1268 |
Long Context GLM-4.6V leads
GLM-4.6V: 41.3 (#138), Granite 4.1 8b: 38.7 (#188)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | Granite 4.1 8b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1358 | 1275 |
Writing & Preference GLM-4.6V leads
GLM-4.6V: 56.8 (#132), Granite 4.1 8b: 48.3 (#199)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | Granite 4.1 8b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1377 | 1291 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1347 | 1249 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1359 | 1269 |
Frequently asked questions
Is GLM-4.6V better than Granite 4.1 8b?
GLM-4.6V is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.9 to 36.8 on the Noometry Index.
Is GLM-4.6V or Granite 4.1 8b better for coding?
GLM-4.6V scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.2 versus 29.9 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do GLM-4.6V and Granite 4.1 8b share?
11 benchmarks have published results for both models. GLM-4.6V has 12 scored results on Noometry and Granite 4.1 8b has 13.