Model comparison

Granite 4.1 30B vs Inkling-Small

Inkling-Small has enough public results to be ranked (#63); Granite 4.1 30B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Last verified . 2 shared benchmarks.

Granite 4.1 30B IBM

34.0

Unranked Sparse

Inkling-Small Thinking Machines Lab

46.5

Rank #63 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. Granite 4.1 30B scores higher in 0 categories and Inkling-Small in 2 categories; 2 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Inkling-Small leads 38.6 to 22.4.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is SciCode: 25.8% for Granite 4.1 30B and 48.7% for Inkling-Small.

Side by side

Granite 4.1 30B and Inkling-Small specifications
Granite 4.1 30BInkling-Small
ProviderIBMThinking Machines Lab
Noometry Index34.046.5
Released2026-04-292026-07-15
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window—524K
Max output—1.05M
Input $ / M tokens—$0.45
Output $ / M tokens—$1.20
Results tracked233

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Inkling-Small leads

Granite 4.1 30B: 35.2, Inkling-Small: 43.6 (#85)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.1 30BInkling-Small
SciCode25.8%48.7%
LMArena WebDev—1409
LMArena Coding—1451

Reasoning Inkling-Small leads

Granite 4.1 30B: 22.4, Inkling-Small: 38.6 (#63)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.1 30BInkling-Small
CritPt0%8.3%
ARC-AGI-2—40.1%
ARC-AGI-1—84%
Chess Puzzles—18%
LMArena Hard Prompts—1423
Mystery Game Puzzles—6%
Epoch Capabilities Index—150.15

Math Not comparable

Granite 4.1 30B: —, Inkling-Small: 45.1 (#77)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.1 30BInkling-Small
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—46.3%
FrontierMath Tier 4—17.1%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—90%
ProofBench—6%
LMArena Math—1459

Knowledge Not comparable

Granite 4.1 30B: —, Inkling-Small: 48.2 (#77)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.1 30BInkling-Small
GPQA Diamond—88.5%
SimpleQA Verified—19.1%
LMArena Expert—1442

Multimodal Not comparable

Granite 4.1 30B: —, Inkling-Small: 39.1 (#62)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.1 30BInkling-Small
LMArena Vision—1235

Multilingual Not comparable

Granite 4.1 30B: —, Inkling-Small: 51.7 (#104)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.1 30BInkling-Small
LMArena Non-English—1402
LMArena Chinese—1465
LMArena French—1436
LMArena German—1405
LMArena Japanese—1405
LMArena Korean—1363
LMArena Russian—1391
LMArena Spanish—1428

Instruction Following Not comparable

Granite 4.1 30B: —, Inkling-Small: 73.8 (#114)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.1 30BInkling-Small
LMArena Instruction Following—1399

Long Context Not comparable

Granite 4.1 30B: —, Inkling-Small: 42.7 (#118)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.1 30BInkling-Small
LMArena Longer Query—1401

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Granite 4.1 30B: —, Inkling-Small: 59.6 (#107)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.1 30BInkling-Small
LMArena Text—1414
LMArena Creative Writing—1331
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—1491
LMArena Multi-Turn—1418

Frequently asked questions

Is Granite 4.1 30B better than Inkling-Small?

Inkling-Small has enough public results to be ranked (#63); Granite 4.1 30B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Is Granite 4.1 30B or Inkling-Small better for coding?

Inkling-Small scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.6 versus 35.2 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Granite 4.1 30B and Inkling-Small share?

2 benchmarks have published results for both models. Granite 4.1 30B has 2 scored results on Noometry and Inkling-Small has 33.

Related comparisons

Go deeper