Model comparison

Granite 4.1 30B vs Qwen3.6 Plus

Qwen3.6 Plus has enough public results to be ranked (#54); Granite 4.1 30B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Last verified . 2 shared benchmarks.

Granite 4.1 30B IBM

33.4

Unranked Sparse

Qwen3.6 Plus Alibaba (Qwen)

47.3

Rank #54 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. Granite 4.1 30B scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3.6 Plus in 2 categories; 2 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Qwen3.6 Plus leads 28.5 to 21.7.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is SciCode: 25.8% for Granite 4.1 30B and 40.7% for Qwen3.6 Plus.
  • Granite 4.1 30B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Granite 4.1 30B and Qwen3.6 Plus specifications
Granite 4.1 30BQwen3.6 Plus
ProviderIBMAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index33.447.3
Released2026-04-292026-03-31
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window—1M
Max output—66K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.50
Output $ / M tokens—$3
Results tracked237

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Qwen3.6 Plus leads

Granite 4.1 30B: 34.6, Qwen3.6 Plus: 40.6 (#125)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.1 30BQwen3.6 Plus
SciCode25.8%40.7%
SWE-bench Verified—57.9%
LMArena WebDev—1461
LMArena Coding—1467
ALE-Bench—670.15

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Granite 4.1 30B: —, Qwen3.6 Plus: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.1 30BQwen3.6 Plus
Vending-Bench 2—5,115

Reasoning Qwen3.6 Plus leads

Granite 4.1 30B: 21.7, Qwen3.6 Plus: 28.5 (#89)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.1 30BQwen3.6 Plus
CritPt0%2.9%
NYT Connections (extended)—60.3%
Chess Puzzles—17%
Thematic Generalization—59.5%
LMArena Hard Prompts—1449
Mystery Game Puzzles—12%
DTBench—81.9%
LMCA—33.1%
Epoch Capabilities Index—147.67

Math Not comparable

Granite 4.1 30B: —, Qwen3.6 Plus: 50.6 (#44)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.1 30BQwen3.6 Plus
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—38.2%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—93.3%
LMArena Math—1450
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)—26.2%
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)—8.3%

Knowledge Not comparable

Granite 4.1 30B: —, Qwen3.6 Plus: 56.1 (#40)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.1 30BQwen3.6 Plus
GPQA Diamond—88.4%
SimpleQA Verified—44.1%
LMArena Expert—1456

Multilingual Not comparable

Granite 4.1 30B: —, Qwen3.6 Plus: 53.5 (#66)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.1 30BQwen3.6 Plus
LMArena Non-English—1424
LMArena Chinese—1478
LMArena French—1454
LMArena German—1451
LMArena Japanese—1389
LMArena Korean—1381
LMArena Russian—1434
LMArena Spanish—1432

Instruction Following Not comparable

Granite 4.1 30B: —, Qwen3.6 Plus: 75.2 (#70)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.1 30BQwen3.6 Plus
LMArena Instruction Following—1425

Long Context Not comparable

Granite 4.1 30B: —, Qwen3.6 Plus: 45.1 (#48)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.1 30BQwen3.6 Plus
CL-bench—20.3%
LMArena Longer Query—1440

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Granite 4.1 30B: —, Qwen3.6 Plus: 62.4 (#78)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.1 30BQwen3.6 Plus
LMArena Text—1437
LMArena Creative Writing—1405
LMArena Multi-Turn—1438

Frequently asked questions

Is Granite 4.1 30B better than Qwen3.6 Plus?

Qwen3.6 Plus has enough public results to be ranked (#54); Granite 4.1 30B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Is Granite 4.1 30B or Qwen3.6 Plus better for coding?

Qwen3.6 Plus scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.6 versus 34.6 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Granite 4.1 30B and Qwen3.6 Plus share?

2 benchmarks have published results for both models. Granite 4.1 30B has 2 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.6 Plus has 37.

Related comparisons

Go deeper