Model comparison
Granite 4.0 Micro vs Phi-3.5-MoE
Granite 4.0 Micro has enough public results to be ranked (#318); Phi-3.5-MoE does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
MicrosoftSide by side
| Granite 4.0 Micro | Phi-3.5-MoE | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | IBM | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 29.0 | — |
| Released | 2025-10-02 | 2024-08-17 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 131K | — |
| Max output | 118K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.017 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.11 | — |
| Results tracked | 8 | 3 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Reasoning Not comparable
Granite 4.0 Micro: 19.2 (#265), Phi-3.5-MoE: —
| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 Micro | Phi-3.5-MoE |
|---|---|---|
| Chess Puzzles | 0% | — |
| PIQA | — | 88.6% |
Math Not comparable
Granite 4.0 Micro: 12.0 (#307), Phi-3.5-MoE: —
| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 Micro | Phi-3.5-MoE |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 2.8% | — |
| Omni-MATH | 20.9% | — |
| GSM8K | — | 88.7% |
Knowledge Not comparable
Granite 4.0 Micro: 9.9 (#304), Phi-3.5-MoE: —
| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 Micro | Phi-3.5-MoE |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 28.3% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | 39.5% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 30.7% | — |
| BoolQ | — | 84.6% |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Granite 4.0 Micro: 69.9 (#169), Phi-3.5-MoE: —
| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 Micro | Phi-3.5-MoE |
|---|---|---|
| IFEval | 84.9% | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Granite 4.0 Micro: 46.7 (#216), Phi-3.5-MoE: —
| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 Micro | Phi-3.5-MoE |
|---|---|---|
| WildBench | 67% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Granite 4.0 Micro better than Phi-3.5-MoE?
Granite 4.0 Micro has enough public results to be ranked (#318); Phi-3.5-MoE does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
How many benchmarks do Granite 4.0 Micro and Phi-3.5-MoE share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Granite 4.0 Micro has 8 scored results on Noometry and Phi-3.5-MoE has 3.