Model comparison

Claude 3 Sonnet vs Phi-3.5-MoE

Claude 3 Sonnet has enough public results to be ranked (#311); Phi-3.5-MoE does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

Claude 3 Sonnet Anthropic

28.8

Rank #311 Confirmed

Phi-3.5-MoE Microsoft

—

Unranked

Summary

  • Phi-3.5-MoE has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Claude 3 Sonnet and Phi-3.5-MoE specifications
Claude 3 SonnetPhi-3.5-MoE
ProviderAnthropicMicrosoft
Noometry Index28.8—
Released2024-02-292024-08-17
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked303

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Claude 3 Sonnet: 29.2 (#296), Phi-3.5-MoE: —

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 SonnetPhi-3.5-MoE
WeirdML10.2%—
BigCodeBench Instruct42.7%—
LMArena Coding1223—
BigCodeBench Complete53.8%—
HumanEval+64%—
MBPP+69.3%—

Reasoning Not comparable

Claude 3 Sonnet: 19.7 (#232), Phi-3.5-MoE: —

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 SonnetPhi-3.5-MoE
LMArena Hard Prompts1197—
DTBench53.6%—
Epoch Capabilities Index120.69—
PIQA—88.6%
WinoGrande75.1%—

Math Not comparable

Claude 3 Sonnet: 10.0 (#305), Phi-3.5-MoE: —

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 SonnetPhi-3.5-MoE
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20252.5%—
LMArena Math1213—
MATH Level 518.2%—
GSM8K—88.7%

Knowledge Not comparable

Claude 3 Sonnet: 21.1 (#271), Phi-3.5-MoE: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 SonnetPhi-3.5-MoE
GPQA Diamond40.6%—
LMArena Expert1173—
BoolQ—84.6%
MMLU75.9%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Claude 3 Sonnet: 24.7 (#120), Phi-3.5-MoE: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 SonnetPhi-3.5-MoE
LMArena Vision984—

Multilingual Not comparable

Claude 3 Sonnet: 38.0 (#229), Phi-3.5-MoE: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 SonnetPhi-3.5-MoE
LMArena Non-English1205—
LMArena Chinese1188—
LMArena French1228—
LMArena German1204—
LMArena Japanese1131—
LMArena Korean1128—
LMArena Russian1227—
LMArena Spanish1204—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Claude 3 Sonnet: 63.1 (#230), Phi-3.5-MoE: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 SonnetPhi-3.5-MoE
LMArena Instruction Following1200—

Long Context Not comparable

Claude 3 Sonnet: 36.7 (#223), Phi-3.5-MoE: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 SonnetPhi-3.5-MoE
LMArena Longer Query1211—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Claude 3 Sonnet: 42.3 (#233), Phi-3.5-MoE: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 SonnetPhi-3.5-MoE
LMArena Text1218—
LMArena Creative Writing1186—
LMArena Multi-Turn1227—

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude 3 Sonnet better than Phi-3.5-MoE?

Claude 3 Sonnet has enough public results to be ranked (#311); Phi-3.5-MoE does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

How many benchmarks do Claude 3 Sonnet and Phi-3.5-MoE share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 3 Sonnet has 30 scored results on Noometry and Phi-3.5-MoE has 3.

Related comparisons

Go deeper