Model comparison
Granite 4.0 Micro vs OLMo 2 Furious 13B
Granite 4.0 Micro and OLMo 2 Furious 13B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (29.0 vs 29.7), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Last verified . 5 shared benchmarks.
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)Summary
- They share 5 benchmarks with published results for both. Granite 4.0 Micro scores higher in 3 categories and OLMo 2 Furious 13B in 2 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where OLMo 2 Furious 13B leads 23.1 to 12.0.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is IFEval: 84.9% for Granite 4.0 Micro and 73% for OLMo 2 Furious 13B.
Side by side
| Granite 4.0 Micro | OLMo 2 Furious 13B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | IBM | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 29.0 | 29.7 |
| Released | 2025-10-02 | 2024-12-31 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 131K | — |
| Max output | 118K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.017 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.11 | — |
| Results tracked | 8 | 12 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Granite 4.0 Micro: —, OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 28.6 (#313)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 Micro | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Coding | — | 10.4% |
Reasoning Granite 4.0 Micro leads
Granite 4.0 Micro: 19.2 (#265), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 15.5 (#314)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 Micro | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| Chess Puzzles | 0% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | — | 16.3% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | — | 20.6% |
| LiveBench | — | 22.1% |
Math OLMo 2 Furious 13B leads
Granite 4.0 Micro: 12.0 (#307), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 23.1 (#273)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 Micro | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| Omni-MATH | 20.9% | 15.6% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 2.8% | — |
| LiveBench Math | — | 13.6% |
Knowledge OLMo 2 Furious 13B leads
Granite 4.0 Micro: 9.9 (#304), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 18.3 (#283)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 Micro | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU-Pro | 39.5% | 31% |
| GPQA (HELM) | 30.7% | 31.6% |
| GPQA Diamond | 28.3% | — |
Instruction Following Granite 4.0 Micro leads
Granite 4.0 Micro: 69.9 (#169), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 60.9 (#248)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 Micro | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| IFEval | 84.9% | 73% |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | — | 60.6% |
Writing & Preference Granite 4.0 Micro leads
Granite 4.0 Micro: 46.7 (#216), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 42.9 (#230)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 Micro | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| WildBench | 67% | 68.9% |
| LiveBench Language | — | 11.2% |
Frequently asked questions
Is Granite 4.0 Micro better than OLMo 2 Furious 13B?
Granite 4.0 Micro and OLMo 2 Furious 13B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (29.0 vs 29.7), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
How many benchmarks do Granite 4.0 Micro and OLMo 2 Furious 13B share?
5 benchmarks have published results for both models. Granite 4.0 Micro has 8 scored results on Noometry and OLMo 2 Furious 13B has 12.