Model comparison

Granite 4.0 Micro vs Nemotron 3 Super

Nemotron 3 Super is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.6 to 28.8 on the Noometry Index. Granite 4.0 Micro costs 4.2× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Nemotron 3 Super's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

Granite 4.0 Micro IBM

28.8

Rank #312 Confirmed

Nemotron 3 Super NVIDIA

39.6

Rank #147 Confirmed

Summary

  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Nemotron 3 Super leads 38.2 to 9.9.
  • Granite 4.0 Micro is cheaper at $0.017 / $0.11 per million input/output tokens, against $0.08 / $0.45 for Nemotron 3 Super.
  • Nemotron 3 Super accepts more context: 262K tokens versus 131K.

Side by side

Granite 4.0 Micro and Nemotron 3 Super specifications
Granite 4.0 MicroNemotron 3 Super
ProviderIBMNVIDIA
Noometry Index28.839.6
Released2025-10-022026-03-11
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window131K262K
Max output118K131K
Input $ / M tokens$0.017$0.08
Output $ / M tokens$0.11$0.45
Results tracked821

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Granite 4.0 Micro: —, Nemotron 3 Super: 38.9 (#153)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.0 MicroNemotron 3 Super
SciCode—36%
WeirdML—38%
LMArena Coding—1403
ALE-Bench—213.9

Reasoning Too close to call

Granite 4.0 Micro: 18.5 (#261), Nemotron 3 Super: 17.9 (#274)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.0 MicroNemotron 3 Super
NYT Connections (extended)—15.4%
CritPt—3.1%
Chess Puzzles0%—
LMArena Hard Prompts—1386

Math Nemotron 3 Super leads

Granite 4.0 Micro: 11.2 (#301), Nemotron 3 Super: 37.6 (#95)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.0 MicroNemotron 3 Super
MathArena Final-Answer Competitions—60.4%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20252.8%—
Omni-MATH20.9%—
LMArena Math—1381

Knowledge Nemotron 3 Super leads

Granite 4.0 Micro: 9.9 (#299), Nemotron 3 Super: 38.2 (#136)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.0 MicroNemotron 3 Super
GPQA Diamond28.3%—
MMLU-Pro39.5%—
GPQA (HELM)30.7%—
LMArena Expert—1397

Multilingual Not comparable

Granite 4.0 Micro: —, Nemotron 3 Super: 48.6 (#139)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.0 MicroNemotron 3 Super
LMArena Non-English—1356
LMArena Chinese—1430
LMArena French—1404
LMArena German—1341
LMArena Russian—1336
LMArena Spanish—1417

Instruction Following Nemotron 3 Super leads

Granite 4.0 Micro: 70.0 (#164), Nemotron 3 Super: 71.4 (#149)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.0 MicroNemotron 3 Super
IFEval84.9%—
LMArena Instruction Following—1347

Long Context Not comparable

Granite 4.0 Micro: —, Nemotron 3 Super: 41.5 (#134)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.0 MicroNemotron 3 Super
LMArena Longer Query—1362

Writing & Preference Nemotron 3 Super leads

Granite 4.0 Micro: 46.7 (#212), Nemotron 3 Super: 56.1 (#135)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.0 MicroNemotron 3 Super
LMArena Text—1378
LMArena Creative Writing—1317
WildBench67%—
LMArena Multi-Turn—1369

Frequently asked questions

Is Granite 4.0 Micro better than Nemotron 3 Super?

Nemotron 3 Super is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.6 to 28.8 on the Noometry Index. Granite 4.0 Micro costs 4.2× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Nemotron 3 Super's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Which is cheaper, Granite 4.0 Micro or Nemotron 3 Super?

Granite 4.0 Micro is cheaper. It lists at $0.017 per million input tokens and $0.11 per million output tokens; Nemotron 3 Super lists at $0.08 and $0.45.

Which has the bigger context window?

Nemotron 3 Super does, with 262K tokens against 131K.

How many benchmarks do Granite 4.0 Micro and Nemotron 3 Super share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Granite 4.0 Micro has 8 scored results on Noometry and Nemotron 3 Super has 21.

Related comparisons

Go deeper