Model comparison

Granite 4.0 Micro vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning

Nemotron 3.5 Lightning is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.3 to 28.8 on the Noometry Index. Granite 4.0 Micro costs 2.1× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Nemotron 3.5 Lightning's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

Granite 4.0 Micro IBM

28.8

Rank #312 Confirmed

Nemotron 3.5 Lightning NVIDIA

39.3

Rank #156 Confirmed

Summary

  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Nemotron 3.5 Lightning leads 36.9 to 9.9.
  • Granite 4.0 Micro is cheaper at $0.017 / $0.11 per million input/output tokens, against $0.06 / $0.16 for Nemotron 3.5 Lightning.
  • Nemotron 3.5 Lightning accepts more context: 262K tokens versus 131K.

Side by side

Granite 4.0 Micro and Nemotron 3.5 Lightning specifications
Granite 4.0 MicroNemotron 3.5 Lightning
ProviderIBMNVIDIA
Noometry Index28.839.3
Released2025-10-022026-08-11
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window131K262K
Max output118K262K
Input $ / M tokens$0.017$0.06
Output $ / M tokens$0.11$0.16
Results tracked818

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Granite 4.0 Micro: —, Nemotron 3.5 Lightning: 39.6 (#143)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.0 MicroNemotron 3.5 Lightning
LMArena Coding—1370

Reasoning Nemotron 3.5 Lightning leads

Granite 4.0 Micro: 18.5 (#261), Nemotron 3.5 Lightning: 25.7 (#128)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.0 MicroNemotron 3.5 Lightning
Chess Puzzles0%—
LMArena Hard Prompts—1335

Math Nemotron 3.5 Lightning leads

Granite 4.0 Micro: 11.2 (#301), Nemotron 3.5 Lightning: 34.7 (#156)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.0 MicroNemotron 3.5 Lightning
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20252.8%—
Omni-MATH20.9%—
LMArena Math—1355

Knowledge Nemotron 3.5 Lightning leads

Granite 4.0 Micro: 9.9 (#299), Nemotron 3.5 Lightning: 36.9 (#154)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.0 MicroNemotron 3.5 Lightning
GPQA Diamond28.3%—
MMLU-Pro39.5%—
GPQA (HELM)30.7%—
LMArena Expert—1354

Multilingual Not comparable

Granite 4.0 Micro: —, Nemotron 3.5 Lightning: 44.0 (#175)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.0 MicroNemotron 3.5 Lightning
LMArena Non-English—1292
LMArena Chinese—1356
LMArena French—1369
LMArena German—1280
LMArena Japanese—1213
LMArena Korean—1233
LMArena Russian—1257
LMArena Spanish—1321

Instruction Following Too close to call

Granite 4.0 Micro: 70.0 (#164), Nemotron 3.5 Lightning: 69.8 (#166)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.0 MicroNemotron 3.5 Lightning
IFEval84.9%—
LMArena Instruction Following—1317

Long Context Not comparable

Granite 4.0 Micro: —, Nemotron 3.5 Lightning: 39.9 (#160)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.0 MicroNemotron 3.5 Lightning
LMArena Longer Query—1312

Writing & Preference Nemotron 3.5 Lightning leads

Granite 4.0 Micro: 46.7 (#212), Nemotron 3.5 Lightning: 48.5 (#198)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.0 MicroNemotron 3.5 Lightning
LMArena Text—1324
LMArena Creative Writing—1254
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—1280
WildBench67%—
LMArena Multi-Turn—1327

Frequently asked questions

Is Granite 4.0 Micro better than Nemotron 3.5 Lightning?

Nemotron 3.5 Lightning is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.3 to 28.8 on the Noometry Index. Granite 4.0 Micro costs 2.1× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Nemotron 3.5 Lightning's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Which is cheaper, Granite 4.0 Micro or Nemotron 3.5 Lightning?

Granite 4.0 Micro is cheaper. It lists at $0.017 per million input tokens and $0.11 per million output tokens; Nemotron 3.5 Lightning lists at $0.06 and $0.16.

Which has the bigger context window?

Nemotron 3.5 Lightning does, with 262K tokens against 131K.

How many benchmarks do Granite 4.0 Micro and Nemotron 3.5 Lightning share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Granite 4.0 Micro has 8 scored results on Noometry and Nemotron 3.5 Lightning has 18.

Related comparisons

Go deeper