Model comparison
Granite 4.0 Micro vs Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat
Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.8 to 29.0 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
NVIDIASummary
- The widest gap is in math, where Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat leads 31.3 to 12.0.
Side by side
| Granite 4.0 Micro | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | IBM | NVIDIA |
| Noometry Index | 29.0 | 31.8 |
| Released | 2025-10-02 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 131K | — |
| Max output | 118K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.017 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.11 | — |
| Results tracked | 8 | 9 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Granite 4.0 Micro: —, Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 29.9 (#300)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 Micro | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | — | 1025 |
Reasoning Too close to call
Granite 4.0 Micro: 19.2 (#265), Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 20.0 (#246)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 Micro | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat |
|---|---|---|
| Chess Puzzles | 0% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1047 |
Math Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat leads
Granite 4.0 Micro: 12.0 (#307), Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 31.3 (#226)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 Micro | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 2.8% | — |
| Omni-MATH | 20.9% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1072 |
Knowledge Not comparable
Granite 4.0 Micro: 9.9 (#304), Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: —
| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 Micro | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 28.3% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | 39.5% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 30.7% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Granite 4.0 Micro: —, Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 28.8 (#270)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 Micro | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1063 |
Instruction Following Granite 4.0 Micro leads
Granite 4.0 Micro: 69.9 (#169), Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 54.2 (#279)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 Micro | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat |
|---|---|---|
| IFEval | 84.9% | — |
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1060 |
Long Context Not comparable
Granite 4.0 Micro: —, Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 30.4 (#288)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 Micro | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 998 |
Writing & Preference Granite 4.0 Micro leads
Granite 4.0 Micro: 46.7 (#216), Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 31.6 (#283)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 Micro | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1098 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1091 |
| WildBench | 67% | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1058 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Granite 4.0 Micro better than Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat?
Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.8 to 29.0 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Granite 4.0 Micro and Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Granite 4.0 Micro has 8 scored results on Noometry and Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat has 9.