Model comparison

Granite 3.1 8b Instruct vs Mistral Small 3

Granite 3.1 8b Instruct and Mistral Small 3 score almost the same on the Noometry Index (31.8 vs 30.9), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

Granite 3.1 8b Instruct IBM

31.8

Rank #256 Confirmed

Mistral Small 3 Mistral AI

30.9

Rank #268 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Granite 3.1 8b Instruct scores higher in 4 categories and Mistral Small 3 in 4 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Granite 3.1 8b Instruct leads 30.4 to 15.3.

Side by side

Granite 3.1 8b Instruct and Mistral Small 3 specifications
Granite 3.1 8b InstructMistral Small 3
ProviderIBMMistral AI
Noometry Index31.830.9
Released—2025-01-30
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window—33K
Max output—16K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.05
Output $ / M tokens—$0.08
Results tracked1324

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Mistral Small 3 leads

Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 33.9 (#232), Mistral Small 3: 36.0 (#203)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.1 8b InstructMistral Small 3
LMArena Coding11861246
BigCodeBench Instruct—45.3%
BigCodeBench Complete—50.4%

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 23.9 (#113), Mistral Small 3: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.1 8b InstructMistral Small 3
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard27.1%—

Reasoning Granite 3.1 8b Instruct leads

Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 21.2 (#204), Mistral Small 3: 18.2 (#269)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.1 8b InstructMistral Small 3
LMArena Hard Prompts11461233
Chess Puzzles—0%
Epoch Capabilities Index—127.06

Math Granite 3.1 8b Instruct leads

Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 30.4 (#210), Mistral Small 3: 15.3 (#290)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.1 8b InstructMistral Small 3
LMArena Math11521240
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—6.7%

Knowledge Granite 3.1 8b Instruct leads

Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 30.6 (#218), Mistral Small 3: 25.0 (#258)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.1 8b InstructMistral Small 3
LMArena Expert11421202
GPQA Diamond—47.3%
Confabulations—25.2%

Multilingual Mistral Small 3 leads

Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 31.1 (#255), Mistral Small 3: 37.5 (#231)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.1 8b InstructMistral Small 3
LMArena Non-English10991198
LMArena Chinese11451204
LMArena Russian10921216
LMArena French—1202
LMArena German—1211
LMArena Japanese—1111
LMArena Korean—1188

Instruction Following Mistral Small 3 leads

Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 58.9 (#254), Mistral Small 3: 63.9 (#224)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.1 8b InstructMistral Small 3
LMArena Instruction Following11311214

Long Context Mistral Small 3 leads

Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 35.2 (#236), Mistral Small 3: 37.8 (#206)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.1 8b InstructMistral Small 3
LMArena Longer Query11621246

Writing & Preference Granite 3.1 8b Instruct leads

Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 35.7 (#261), Mistral Small 3: 32.4 (#275)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.1 8b InstructMistral Small 3
LMArena Text11501234
LMArena Creative Writing11291195
LMArena Multi-Turn11081217
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—707

Frequently asked questions

Is Granite 3.1 8b Instruct better than Mistral Small 3?

Granite 3.1 8b Instruct and Mistral Small 3 score almost the same on the Noometry Index (31.8 vs 30.9), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Is Granite 3.1 8b Instruct or Mistral Small 3 better for coding?

Mistral Small 3 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 36.0 versus 33.9 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Granite 3.1 8b Instruct and Mistral Small 3 share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Granite 3.1 8b Instruct has 13 scored results on Noometry and Mistral Small 3 has 24.

Related comparisons

Go deeper