Model comparison

Granite 3.1 8b Instruct vs Mistral 7B

Granite 3.1 8b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.4 to 23.0 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

Granite 3.1 8b Instruct IBM

32.4

Rank #258 Confirmed

Mistral 7B Mistral AI

23.0

Rank #351 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Granite 3.1 8b Instruct scores higher in 8 categories and Mistral 7B in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Granite 3.1 8b Instruct leads 33.0 to 8.1.

Side by side

Granite 3.1 8b Instruct and Mistral 7B specifications
Granite 3.1 8b InstructMistral 7B
ProviderIBMMistral AI
Noometry Index32.423.0
Released—2023-09-27
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window—8K
Max output—8K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.25
Output $ / M tokens—$0.25
Results tracked1337

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Granite 3.1 8b Instruct leads

Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 34.5 (#233), Mistral 7B: 26.4 (#326)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.1 8b InstructMistral 7B
LMArena Coding11861082
BigCodeBench Instruct—19.5%
BigCodeBench Complete—27.3%
HumanEval+—36%
MBPP+—42.1%

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 24.1 (#120), Mistral 7B: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.1 8b InstructMistral 7B
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard27.1%—

Reasoning Granite 3.1 8b Instruct leads

Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 22.1 (#207), Mistral 7B: 13.1 (#336)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.1 8b InstructMistral 7B
LMArena Hard Prompts11451067
Chess Puzzles—0%
DTBench—42.5%
Adversarial NLI—47.1%
BIG-Bench Hard—56.1%
Epoch Capabilities Index—112.21
HellaSwag—81%
PIQA—83%
WinoGrande—75.3%

Math Granite 3.1 8b Instruct leads

Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 33.0 (#209), Mistral 7B: 8.1 (#325)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.1 8b InstructMistral 7B
LMArena Math11521085
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—0.3%
MATH Level 5—3.7%
GSM8K—54.4%

Knowledge Granite 3.1 8b Instruct leads

Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 31.1 (#220), Mistral 7B: 7.4 (#311)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.1 8b InstructMistral 7B
LMArena Expert11421036
GPQA Diamond—15.2%
ARC (AI2) Challenge—78.6%
BoolQ—87.4%
MMLU—62.5%
OpenBookQA—79.8%
TriviaQA—75.2%

Multilingual Granite 3.1 8b Instruct leads

Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 30.9 (#260), Mistral 7B: 25.8 (#283)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.1 8b InstructMistral 7B
LMArena Non-English10991012
LMArena Chinese11451009
LMArena Russian10921018
LMArena French—1037
LMArena German—987
LMArena Japanese—878
LMArena Spanish—1026

Instruction Following Granite 3.1 8b Instruct leads

Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 58.6 (#259), Mistral 7B: 54.2 (#280)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.1 8b InstructMistral 7B
LMArena Instruction Following11311060

Long Context Granite 3.1 8b Instruct leads

Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 35.2 (#241), Mistral 7B: 32.2 (#271)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.1 8b InstructMistral 7B
LMArena Longer Query11621060

Writing & Preference Granite 3.1 8b Instruct leads

Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 35.5 (#266), Mistral 7B: 30.7 (#286)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.1 8b InstructMistral 7B
LMArena Text11501090
LMArena Creative Writing11291068
LMArena Multi-Turn11081062

Frequently asked questions

Is Granite 3.1 8b Instruct better than Mistral 7B?

Granite 3.1 8b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.4 to 23.0 on the Noometry Index.

Is Granite 3.1 8b Instruct or Mistral 7B better for coding?

Granite 3.1 8b Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 34.5 versus 26.4 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Granite 3.1 8b Instruct and Mistral 7B share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Granite 3.1 8b Instruct has 13 scored results on Noometry and Mistral 7B has 37.

Related comparisons

Go deeper