Model comparison

Granite 3.1 8b Instruct vs Llama 2-70B

Granite 3.1 8b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.8 to 24.1 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

Granite 3.1 8b Instruct IBM

31.8

Rank #256 Confirmed

Llama 2-70B Meta

24.1

Rank #343 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Granite 3.1 8b Instruct scores higher in 8 categories and Llama 2-70B in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Granite 3.1 8b Instruct leads 30.6 to 7.4.

Side by side

Granite 3.1 8b Instruct and Llama 2-70B specifications
Granite 3.1 8b InstructLlama 2-70B
ProviderIBMMeta
Noometry Index31.824.1
Released—2023-07-18
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked1335

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Granite 3.1 8b Instruct leads

Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 33.9 (#232), Llama 2-70B: 30.8 (#281)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.1 8b InstructLlama 2-70B
LMArena Coding11861079

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 23.9 (#113), Llama 2-70B: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.1 8b InstructLlama 2-70B
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard27.1%—

Reasoning Granite 3.1 8b Instruct leads

Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 21.2 (#204), Llama 2-70B: 13.7 (#324)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.1 8b InstructLlama 2-70B
LMArena Hard Prompts11461073
DTBench—41.6%
BIG-Bench Hard—64.9%
CommonsenseQA 2.0—50%
Epoch Capabilities Index—113.59
ForecastBench—51.4
HellaSwag—85.3%
LAMBADA—78.9%
PIQA—82.8%
WinoGrande—80.2%

Math Granite 3.1 8b Instruct leads

Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 30.4 (#210), Llama 2-70B: 7.5 (#320)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.1 8b InstructLlama 2-70B
LMArena Math11521091
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—0%
MATH Level 5—3.3%
GSM8K—69.6%

Knowledge Granite 3.1 8b Instruct leads

Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 30.6 (#218), Llama 2-70B: 7.4 (#305)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.1 8b InstructLlama 2-70B
LMArena Expert11421039
GPQA Diamond—26.3%
ARC (AI2) Challenge—78.3%
BoolQ—88.6%
MMLU—69.9%
OpenBookQA—60.2%
TriviaQA—87.6%

Multilingual Granite 3.1 8b Instruct leads

Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 31.1 (#255), Llama 2-70B: 27.9 (#269)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.1 8b InstructLlama 2-70B
LMArena Non-English10991045
LMArena Chinese1145994
LMArena Russian10921083
LMArena French—1089
LMArena German—1041
LMArena Japanese—927
LMArena Korean—964
LMArena Spanish—1142

Instruction Following Granite 3.1 8b Instruct leads

Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 58.9 (#254), Llama 2-70B: 55.1 (#273)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.1 8b InstructLlama 2-70B
LMArena Instruction Following11311071

Long Context Granite 3.1 8b Instruct leads

Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 35.2 (#236), Llama 2-70B: 32.2 (#265)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.1 8b InstructLlama 2-70B
LMArena Longer Query11621062

Writing & Preference Granite 3.1 8b Instruct leads

Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 35.7 (#261), Llama 2-70B: 32.5 (#274)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.1 8b InstructLlama 2-70B
LMArena Text11501115
LMArena Creative Writing11291075
LMArena Multi-Turn11081088

Frequently asked questions

Is Granite 3.1 8b Instruct better than Llama 2-70B?

Granite 3.1 8b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.8 to 24.1 on the Noometry Index.

Is Granite 3.1 8b Instruct or Llama 2-70B better for coding?

Granite 3.1 8b Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 33.9 versus 30.8 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Granite 3.1 8b Instruct and Llama 2-70B share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Granite 3.1 8b Instruct has 13 scored results on Noometry and Llama 2-70B has 35.

Related comparisons

Go deeper