Model comparison

Gemma 3 12B vs Llama 2-70B

Gemma 3 12B is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.1 to 24.4 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 16 shared benchmarks.

Gemma 3 12B Google

32.1

Rank #262 Confirmed

Llama 2-70B Meta

24.4

Rank #349 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 16 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 3 12B scores higher in 8 categories and Llama 2-70B in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Gemma 3 12B leads 26.5 to 7.4.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 16.7% for Gemma 3 12B and 0% for Llama 2-70B.

Side by side

Gemma 3 12B and Llama 2-70B specifications
Gemma 3 12BLlama 2-70B
ProviderGoogleMeta
Noometry Index32.124.4
Released2025-03-122023-07-18
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window131K—
Max output8K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.05—
Output $ / M tokens$0.15—
Results tracked2435

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Too close to call

Gemma 3 12B: 31.7 (#280), Llama 2-70B: 31.4 (#286)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 12BLlama 2-70B
LMArena Coding12811079
SciCode17.4%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Gemma 3 12B: 25.5 (#108), Llama 2-70B: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 12BLlama 2-70B
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard30.4%—

Reasoning Gemma 3 12B leads

Gemma 3 12B: 15.7 (#313), Llama 2-70B: 14.4 (#325)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 12BLlama 2-70B
LMArena Hard Prompts13091073
DTBench48.8%41.6%
Epoch Capabilities Index123.5113.79
CritPt0%—
Chess Puzzles0%—
LMCA4.5%—
BIG-Bench Hard—64.9%
CommonsenseQA 2.0—50%
ForecastBench—51.4
HellaSwag—85.3%
LAMBADA—78.9%
PIQA—82.8%
WinoGrande—80.2%

Math Gemma 3 12B leads

Gemma 3 12B: 22.3 (#279), Llama 2-70B: 8.1 (#326)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 12BLlama 2-70B
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202516.7%0%
LMArena Math13071091
MATH Level 5—3.3%
GSM8K—69.6%

Knowledge Gemma 3 12B leads

Gemma 3 12B: 26.5 (#257), Llama 2-70B: 7.4 (#310)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 12BLlama 2-70B
GPQA Diamond39.5%26.3%
LMArena Expert12481039
Vectara Hallucination Rate4.4%—
ARC (AI2) Challenge—78.3%
BoolQ—88.6%
MMLU—69.9%
OpenBookQA—60.2%
TriviaQA—87.6%

Multimodal Not comparable

Gemma 3 12B: —, Llama 2-70B: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 12BLlama 2-70B
MindCube46.7%—

Multilingual Gemma 3 12B leads

Gemma 3 12B: 45.7 (#165), Llama 2-70B: 27.7 (#274)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 12BLlama 2-70B
LMArena Non-English13181045
LMArena German13701041
LMArena Russian13351083
LMArena Chinese—995
LMArena French—1090
LMArena Japanese—927
LMArena Korean—964
LMArena Spanish—1143

Instruction Following Gemma 3 12B leads

Gemma 3 12B: 68.6 (#186), Llama 2-70B: 54.9 (#278)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 12BLlama 2-70B
LMArena Instruction Following12991071

Long Context Gemma 3 12B leads

Gemma 3 12B: 40.0 (#162), Llama 2-70B: 32.3 (#270)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 12BLlama 2-70B
LMArena Longer Query13171062

Writing & Preference Gemma 3 12B leads

Gemma 3 12B: 47.5 (#209), Llama 2-70B: 32.3 (#279)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 12BLlama 2-70B
LMArena Text13341115
LMArena Creative Writing13311075
LMArena Multi-Turn13341088
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1126—

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemma 3 12B better than Llama 2-70B?

Gemma 3 12B is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.1 to 24.4 on the Noometry Index.

Is Gemma 3 12B or Llama 2-70B better for coding?

They score almost the same on coding (31.7 vs 31.4); test both on your own repository before choosing.

How many benchmarks do Gemma 3 12B and Llama 2-70B share?

16 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 3 12B has 24 scored results on Noometry and Llama 2-70B has 35.

Related comparisons

Go deeper